2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NaCl Crust Architecture and Its Impact on Evaporation: Three‐Dimensional Insights

Abstract: Salt precipitation over porous media due to evaporation is known to affect various important processes, including evaporation itself. Many studies have shown that salt crust precipitation reduces evaporation rate, and it has been suggested that the crust constitutes a barrier to vapor flow. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how a porous medium such as the salt crust does not enable upward liquid water transfer by capillary flow. Herein, we show by various imaging methods that the salt crust grows out of specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(84 reference statements)
6
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The salt crust diminishes the evaporation rate significantly, as previously reported by many studies [3,10,23,24] employing different methodologies, including micro-lysimeter measurements [23,24], the Bowen ratio [25], eddy correlation [9,10,26], and a static chamber [27], with studies carried out in both the field and the lab using repacked soil columns [1,3,28]. The main reason for the above effects on transport is that salt crusts also impede water vapor transport into the atmosphere by blocking the gas flow, much like a cover of straw or gravel mulch [12,29]. The salt crust also tends to form a dome [30], which causes a disconnection between the salt crust and the soil matrix, further limiting the evaporation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The salt crust diminishes the evaporation rate significantly, as previously reported by many studies [3,10,23,24] employing different methodologies, including micro-lysimeter measurements [23,24], the Bowen ratio [25], eddy correlation [9,10,26], and a static chamber [27], with studies carried out in both the field and the lab using repacked soil columns [1,3,28]. The main reason for the above effects on transport is that salt crusts also impede water vapor transport into the atmosphere by blocking the gas flow, much like a cover of straw or gravel mulch [12,29]. The salt crust also tends to form a dome [30], which causes a disconnection between the salt crust and the soil matrix, further limiting the evaporation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The evaporation varied dynamically with salt precipitation [31] and reflected the salt crust formation process [29]. All treatments were performed under the same conditions before the flood (from day 1 to day 40); therefore, we analyzed the evaporation rate using the mean values of all treatments (a total of 15 columns).…”
Section: Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower is tolerance, lower is Cmax, indicating that through their resilience to salt, tolerant species may be able to compete with glycophytes. Once transpiration is suppressed, evaporation becomes the dominant process, although during dry outs, salt crust formation can have a major role in lowering evaporation (Nachshon et al, ). However, whether Cmax may represent an underestimation of maximum salinity, it still provides an important indication of how salt tolerance can exert an active forcing on salinization dynamics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, Cmax depends on salt tolerance only and represents the concentration for which the ability of plants to uptake water from the soil becomes completely impaired (i.e., Cmax is higher for halophytes given their ability to better exploit water in the soil). At Cmax, evaporation becomes dominant, although other processes like salt‐crust formation can occur at this stage, leading to a substantial lowering of evaporative rates or even evaporation suppression (Eloukabi et al, ; Fujimaki et al, ; Nachshon et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%