Nachhaltige kommunale Haushaltssicherung durch die Koproduktion öffentlicher Wirkungen mit Bürgerinnen und Bürgern?

Löffler, Elke; Timm-Arnold, Peter

doi:10.5771/0947-9856-2016-6-306

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each session was recorded (with consent of the participants) and summaries of the discussions were fed back to participants for quality control. Participants also received the final research report (Löffler et al., 2015).…”

Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter?

Loeffler

Timm-Arnold²

2020

Public Policy and Administration

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses the relationship between modes of governance at local level and the adoption of user and community co-production approaches in community safety and social care services, based on a German case study. The findings draw on a series of intensive focus groups with managers and staff of public services in four different regions in Germany, exploring existing levels of co-production and its potential in social care and community safety services, with particular focus on older and young people. The paper provides the first clear research evidence on how approaches to co-production are specific to the modes of governance within which they take place. The paper concludes with policy conclusions, both in the two programme areas concerned and in local public services more generally.

show abstract

Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter?

Loeffler

Timm-Arnold²

2020

Public Policy and Administration

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Strengtheningthepartnershipandcollaborationbetweengovernmentsandprivateaswellascivic sectoractorshasemergedasastrongdemandofopengovernmentandofnewpublicgovernance models (DGCONNECT,2013,p.6;Löffler&Timm-Arnold,2013,p.3).Alongthedemand,cocreationandco-productionofpublicservicesaroseasnewtrendtoengagecitizensandbusinessesmore activelyinpublicservicedesignandpublicserviceprovisioning.Differentauthorsandinstitutions considertheseconceptsasimportantsocialandeconomicassetsforthepublicsector (Bovaird,2007;DGCONNECT,2013;EuropeanCommission,2013;Koch,Füller,&Brunswicker,2011;Linders, 2012;Löffler & Timm-Arnold, 2013;Nam, 2012;Pestoff, 2006;Pestoff, Osborne, & Brandsen, 2006;Ramaswamy,2009;Sorensen&Torfing,2012).Thewidediffusionofsocialtechnologies suchasWeb2.0andsocialmediaintheprivateandcivicsectors (Nambisan&Nambisan,2013,p. 12),andincreasinglyalsointhepublicsector (Ferro,Loukis,Charalabidis,&Osella,2013,p.360;Mergel,2012,p.44)promotethisevolution.However,governmentsarelaggingbehindinregardto awidelyaccepteduseofsuchsocialtechnologies (Cassia&Magno,2009,p.334;Linders,2012,p.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting Communities through Social Government in Co-Creation and Co-Production of Public Services

Wimmer

Scherer

2018

International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments are facing demands towards more transparency, better connectivity and collaboration among different actors in public service provisioning. Their constituencies demand that public services better reflect citizens' needs and social innovation. Integrating Internet, Web 2.0, social media and new concepts of open government and community governance bear tremendous potentials for engaging citizens and businesses in co-creation and co-production of public services and therewith addressing their high expectations. This paper first reviews existing concepts of co-creation and co-production. Subsequently, the Social Government (SocialGov) concept is introduced, which implements new trends of co-creation and co-production of public services in a collaborative environment. In SocialGov, the actors collaborate on the par with one another and the citizens and businesses take over social and public responsibility in their local communities.

show abstract

Koproduzieren – eine lebenswerte Stadt gemeinschaftlich entwickeln, umsetzen und bewahren

Abt

2022

Von Beteiligung Zur Koproduktion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ZusammenfassungDie Beteiligung von Bürger*innen ist in deutschen Kommunen schon lange erprobt, ehrenamtliches Engagement trägt seit langem zur Funktionsfähigkeit von Kommunen und zur Lebensqualität in den Quartieren bei. Neu in der Diskussion stehen jedoch weitergehende Kooperationsformen, die unter dem Begriff „Koproduktion“ zusammengefasst werden. Verbunden ist mit Koproduktion die Erwartung an eine Zusammenarbeit mit neuen Akteuren, die Aufgaben übernehmen, die die Kommune nur noch schwer alleine erfüllen kann. Doch was „Koproduktion“ genau bedeutet und was sie unterscheidet von der bisherigen Mitwirkung von und der Zusammenarbeit mit Bürger*innen – das ist vor Ort meist unklar. Das Konzept der Koproduktion beleuchtet dieser einleitende Beitrag, der durch die nachfolgenden Reflexionen experimenteller Koproduktionen in der Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung vertieft wird.

show abstract

Nachhaltige kommunale Haushaltssicherung durch die Koproduktion öffentlicher Wirkungen mit Bürgerinnen und Bürgern?

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter?

Comparing user and community co-production approaches in local ‘welfare’ and ‘law and order’ services: Does the governance mode matter?

Supporting Communities through Social Government in Co-Creation and Co-Production of Public Services

Koproduzieren – eine lebenswerte Stadt gemeinschaftlich entwickeln, umsetzen und bewahren

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About