N2O, CO2, Production, and C Sequestration in Vineyards: a Review

Nistor, Eleonora; Dobrei, A.; Camen, D.; Sala, F.; Prundeanu, H.

doi:10.1007/s11270-018-3942-7

Cited by 18 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conventional practices (e.g., maintaining bare soil in the inter-rows through the use of tillage) result in SOC losses in vineyard systems (Eldon and Gershenson, 2015), but alternative viticultural practices (e.g., using cover cropping) may lead to SOC sequestration (Nistor et al, 2018). SOC sequestration corresponds to the process of transferring carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the atmosphere into the soil through plants, plant residues and other organic solids which are stored or retained in the soil as part of the soil organic matter (SOM) (Olson et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis

Payen

Sykes

Alexander

et al. 2021

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis

Payen

Sykes

Alexander

et al. 2021

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Perennial fruit trees act as strong carbon sink by sequestering the atmospheric carbon (Sugiura et al, 2007). Studies in the past showed carbon sequestration capacity (tons/ha/year) of 7.96 by apple (Qaisar et al, 2018), 65.00 by cocoa (Kongsager et al, 2013), 49.50 by grape (Nistor et al, 2018), 14.72 by oil palm (Pulhin et al, 2014), 27.25 by mango (Chavan and Ganesh, 2012), 15.73 by coconut (Magat, 2009), 6.30 by kiwi (Holmes et al, 2015), and 76.00 by sweet orange (Kongsager et al, 2013). However, conversion of forest land into fruit orchard cultivation led to 5-23% and 4-21% reduction in soil organic carbon and N-stock, respectively.…”

Section: Fruit Crops As Carbon Sink and Response At Elevated Comentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Fruit Crops: An Overview

Srivastava

Mousavi

et al. 2021

International Journal of Fruit Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fruit crops offer a strong sink for sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide, thereby, aid in moderating the impact of climate change-related issues, besides creating a parallel nutrient sink. Mere annual application of organic manures/composts has failed to address different soil fertility functions due to failure to prolong the impact of soil organic pool on long-term basis. The paradigm shifts from purely inorganic to either organic fertilizers or in combination with chemical fertilizers and microbial inoculants (preferably in consortium mode) started gaining wide scale use for enhanced soil health vis-à-vis elevated quality production and reduced rhizosphere CO 2 emmission. This change of concept later formed the basis for Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM)-based strategy involving three basic components viz., microbial inoculants (biofertilizers), inorganic fertilizers, and organic fertilizers. Development of microbial consortium exploiting the microbial synergisms with variety of fruit crops as an important component of ISFM is one of the popular methods of managing multiple soil fertility constraints occurring within the rhizosphere. Further advancements in rhizosphere-specific consortia (often by scaling up crop-microbiome) mediated ISFM could further fulfil the nutrient demand and supply by crop. Upscaling such studies through rhizosphere hybridization has provided some initial inroads in harnessing the potential of different rhizosphere microbial communities. ISFM studies carried out in fruit crops in India, Iran, and China showed better agronomic response and soil health-related properties, considered very close to climate-resilient soil fertility management, a gateway to sustainable quality production. The review also highlights the future directions for ISFM in fruit crops catering to their multiple requirements.

show abstract

“…This means that to put any innovation into practice it is crucial to understand the preferences of the potential consumers. In any case, the quality of a wine, as with other attributes, depends on several factors, some of which are difficult to control [101].…”

Section: Innovation Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contributions from Literature for Understanding Wine Marketing

Martinho

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marketing for wines is a determinant tool for several stakeholders within the wine sector, but there are not many studies concerning the topic “wine marketing” and even fewer that take a bibliometric approach. In turn, wine is a strategic agri-food product for the economy of several countries around the world, particularly in Mediterranean countries. Beyond the economic level, wine has an environmental, social, and cultural dimension. All these dimensions have implications in any plan for the wine sector and should be taken into account. In addition, these dimensions change around the world in accordance with different local factors. In this way, sometimes, it is not easy to design adjusted marketing plans for the wine sector, namely, in international markets. Taking the frameworks into account, the main objective of this study is to explore the scientific documents available on scientific platforms, namely, in the Web of Science, related to “wine marketing”. These studies (87 documents) were first explored through bibliometric software, such as the VOSviewer and the Atlas.ti, and then analyzed individually to capture the main insights shown by the scientific literature about wine marketing. To better organize the literature survey, with the information obtained from the bibliometric analysis, the following indexes were identified through factor analysis: “supply index”, “demand index”, “winery strategy index”, “tourism index”, “innovation index”, and “wine characteristics index”. The supply index highlights questions related to new technologies, climate change, logistics in international markets, institutions and regulations, being the main factors that influence wine producers. The demand index stresses the relevance, for consumers, of the relationship between the price and quality of a wine. On the other hand, younger consumers, in general, consume wine outdoors while socializing, giving importance to the label, often when the wine is recommended by someone. Older consumers give greater importance to the wine’s variety and to its region of origin. The winery strategy index shows the importance of questions relating to agri-chains, market differentiation, the history, and the brand. The tourism index brings together aspects associated with the complementarity between activities in the wine sector, wine routes, and contributions from culture and landscape. The innovation index highlights aspects related to the quality and the perceptions of the consumers. Finally, the wine characteristics index shows the little importance given by scientific literature relating to wine marketing and to attributes such as alcohol. A search on the Web of Science for the topic addressed here and “bibliometric” showed that there has been no research carried out with the approach taken here, showing the novelty of this study.

show abstract

N2O, CO2, Production, and C Sequestration in Vineyards: a Review

Cited by 18 publications

References 62 publications

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis

Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Fruit Crops: An Overview

Contributions from Literature for Understanding Wine Marketing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About