1999
DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N2-(1-Carboxyethyl)deoxyguanosine, a Nonenzymatic Glycation Adduct of DNA, Induces Single-Strand Breaks and Increases Mutation Frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sucrose irreversibly glycosylates proteins (Dragsted et al 2002). In this context, Pischetsrieder et al (1999) demonstrated that DNA (Mullokandov et al 1994). It is well known that high levels of DNA damage contribute to neurodegeneration (Madabhushi et al 2014, Coppedè andMigliore 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sucrose irreversibly glycosylates proteins (Dragsted et al 2002). In this context, Pischetsrieder et al (1999) demonstrated that DNA (Mullokandov et al 1994). It is well known that high levels of DNA damage contribute to neurodegeneration (Madabhushi et al 2014, Coppedè andMigliore 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA adducts arising from MG could induce mutations in E. coli cells and G 3 C and G 3 T transversions in supF gene in mammalian cells (25,26). However, the lesion-containing DNA substrates used in these previous mutagenesis experiments were prepared by the direct treatment of undamaged DNA with dihydroxyacetone or MG (25,26); thus, the identity and homogeneity of the DNA adducts were not carefully assessed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lesion-containing DNA substrates used in these previous mutagenesis experiments were prepared by the direct treatment of undamaged DNA with dihydroxyacetone or MG (25,26); thus, the identity and homogeneity of the DNA adducts were not carefully assessed. In light of the previous findings that DinB is capable of bypassing, in an error-free fashion, a number of N 2 -dG lesions (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), we reason that this polymerase may also be involved in the bypass of N 2 -CEdG.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these is the receptor-independent modification of the protein structure, leading to the cross-linking of matrix proteins [39] , the decreased catalytic activity of enzymes [40,41] , the occurrence of epitopes with new immunological properties [42] , or the decreased clearance of lipoproteins [43] . DNA damage may be caused via induction of strand breaks, punctual mutations, the occurrence of abasic sites, or depurination [10,44] . Secondly, AGEs interact directly with their specific receptors, of which the receptor for AGEs (RAGE) is of pathogenetic importance.…”
Section: Biological Effects Of Agesmentioning
confidence: 99%