Myths and the definition of policy problems

Abstract

In this paper we argue that behind widely accepted problem definitions are myths, stories which draw on tradition and taken for granted knowledge. These myths, which may or may not be true in a factual sense, are important to the definition of problems because they link public issues to widely accepted ways of understanding the world and to shared moral evaluations of conditions, events, and possible solutions to problems.Such myths perform a double-edged function in a policy or planning process. On the one hand, they can provide creative inspiration for policies, a way of translating community values into action proposals, and a powerful means to communicate to a broad public and rally support. They can mediate social and economic change by allowing new policies to carry familiar meaning. On the other hand, a myth can conceal crucial contradictions and realities, legitimize policies that benefit the powerful, and support anachronistic perceptions of policy problems.These ideas are explored in case histories of two areas of urban policy. In one we trace the support for home ownership to a transformation of the Jeffersonian myth of the independent yeoman farmer as the ideal citizen. This use of myth made home ownership the cornerstone of US housing policies and helped suppress alternatives. Though debate over home ownership occurs in the context of housing policy, the tacit purpose is to maintain a myth which is central to our identity as a nation. In the second example, public officials and analysts engaged in an explicit myth-making process to garner support for public-private partnerships as a central tool in urban redevelopment. The myths, which drew on familiar themes, made socially beneficial cooperation seem easy to achieve and legitimized new political and institutional arrangements though it also concealed implementation difficulties.Though myths complicate the effort to use rational, systematic analysis, they are an inevitable part of policy making and planning processes. Planning professionals must openly confront myths and make creative, responsible, use of them rather than allow policies and plans to be subject to their unexamined influence.

Society versus the State

“…de Neufville and Barton (1987) examine the central place of such narratives in the de nition of policy problems. They argue that narratives -in the sense of culturally shared and morally charged social meanings expressed in story form -comprise a vital component in the construction of social policy and in providing the "emotional charge" necessary for mobilising suf cient support for the implementation of particular kinds of social policy measures.…”

Mitos no Desengajamento Moral: Retóricas da Samarco em um Crime Corporativo

“…4, pp. 70-91, janeiro/fevereiro, 2018 www.anpad.org.br/rac valores e ideias (Bottici & Challand, 2006;Esch, 2010), sendo criados na forma de um repertório de narrativas, imagens, símbolos e modos de ação (De Neufville & Barton, 1987).…”

Keeping the faith: policy sciences as the gatekeeper

“…The principle is not confined to individual anecdotes or case studies, but has been borne out in econometric tests of the determinants of economic performance across a comprehensive sample of countries. '' Neufville and Stephen Barton's insightful ''Myths and the Definition of Policy Problems,'' focusing on how myths (in the sense of beliefs derived from tradition and culturally shared taken-for-granted knowledge, rather than false beliefs) skewed the problem definition of US housing policy through elevating home ownership as a sacrosanct objective (de Neufville and Barton 1987). Rosenman et al (1988) demonstrated the huge difference in the expected costs of nuclear waste disposal if the problem definition includes a more appropriate recognition of changes in levels of uncertainty.…”