“…7). Clearly, myocardial perfusion and reduction of ischemia, both of which have been amply demonstrated to occur with the Erbel-type catheter [2][3][4], are preferable to the absence of antegrade coronary flow that occurs during standard balloon inflations. However, the requirement for a large lumen and the retraction and replacement of the guidewire during procedures performed with conventional perfusion devices are limitations that may, in part, explain why these catheters are not used in favor of nonperfusion devices.…”