2017
DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography

Abstract: During the last decade coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become the preeminent noninvasive imaging modality to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) with high accuracy.However, CTA has a limited value in assessing the hemodynamic significance of a given stenosis due to a modest specificity and positive predictive value. In recent years, different CT techniques for detecting myocardial ischemia have emerged, such as CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT), transluminal attenuation gradient (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
46
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It had the advantage of high sensitivity and specificity as well as negative predictive value in comparison with invasive CCTA which was served as the standard of reference for the detection of CAD due to its high temporal resolution and spatial resolution. 3,4 Abundant clinical studies have provided evidences that retrospective ECG-triggered CCTA has the capability of ventricle and aortic valve motion assessment along with systolic-phase information acquisition, 5,6 but retrospective ECG-triggered CCTA indeed lead to a relatively high effective radiation dose caused by the low pitch values. For example, Ko et al 7 reported that the average radiation dose for retrospective ECG-triggering was 10.7 ± 2.70 mSv, while the mean radiation dose was 3.83 ± 0.84 mSv for prospective ECG-gating, suggesting that CCTA performed with prospective ECG-triggering had less effective radiation dose as compared to retrospective ECG-triggering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had the advantage of high sensitivity and specificity as well as negative predictive value in comparison with invasive CCTA which was served as the standard of reference for the detection of CAD due to its high temporal resolution and spatial resolution. 3,4 Abundant clinical studies have provided evidences that retrospective ECG-triggered CCTA has the capability of ventricle and aortic valve motion assessment along with systolic-phase information acquisition, 5,6 but retrospective ECG-triggered CCTA indeed lead to a relatively high effective radiation dose caused by the low pitch values. For example, Ko et al 7 reported that the average radiation dose for retrospective ECG-triggering was 10.7 ± 2.70 mSv, while the mean radiation dose was 3.83 ± 0.84 mSv for prospective ECG-gating, suggesting that CCTA performed with prospective ECG-triggering had less effective radiation dose as compared to retrospective ECG-triggering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main conclusions of this study are: CT is now an advanced field of imaging that provides a wide spectrum of BF data in 546 the heart (Cademartiri et al, 2017;Schindler, 2016). In this study, the patient hearts 547 were imaged using a rest/stress protocol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Anyway, today CCT is one of the most studied and well-validated cardiac imaging techniques we can conceive and is ready to play a significant and growing role in cardiovascular medicine. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] THE NEW LANDSCAPE AFTER UPDATED NICE GUIDELINES 2017…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%