2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-006-1156-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mykologisches Labor

Abstract: The clinical presentation of fungal infections of the skin, hair, or nails may be varied and confusing. To avoid delays in treatment and early spread of the infection, adequate diagnostics are necessary. This requires both the clinical expertise of the physicians as well as the capability to perform various laboratory tests. Classical methods are based on microscopy, different culture procedures, and histological examination. Genotypic approaches for the detection and identification of fungal pathogens have im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 The development of optimised antimycotic therapy regimens stresses the need for accurate diagnosis and species differentiation, especially in therapy refractant and recurrent disease. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Hitherto existing diagnostic methods include KOH preparation, dermatophyte culture, PCR, and histopathology with PASstaining, 18 but they all share certain drawbacks in terms of sensitivity or specificity, time delay, or costintensity and effort. [19][20][21][22][23] Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) offer a quick and non-invasive view of the patients nail in real-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 The development of optimised antimycotic therapy regimens stresses the need for accurate diagnosis and species differentiation, especially in therapy refractant and recurrent disease. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Hitherto existing diagnostic methods include KOH preparation, dermatophyte culture, PCR, and histopathology with PASstaining, 18 but they all share certain drawbacks in terms of sensitivity or specificity, time delay, or costintensity and effort. [19][20][21][22][23] Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) offer a quick and non-invasive view of the patients nail in real-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%