2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-006-0059-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycotoxins in Australia: biocontrol of aflatoxin in peanuts

Abstract: The major mycotoxin problem in Australia is the formation of aflatoxins in peanuts by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus. This is controlled by good farm management practice, segregation into grades on aflatoxin content at intake to shelling facilities, colour sorting and aflatoxin assays. A second problem is the potential presence of ochratoxin A in grapes and grape products, resulting from infection by Aspergillus carbonarius. Good quality control before and during wine making ensures ochratoxin A is kept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest successes to date have been achieved with this approach to reduce AF contamination in cotton (Cotty, 1994), peanuts (Dorner et al, 1998;Dorner, 2004Dorner, , 2008Pitt and Hocking, 2006) and more recently in maize (Abbas et al, 2006). Two products of nontoxigenic strains have received U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration as biopesticides to control AF contamination in cotton and peanuts in several states of the USA (Dorner, 2004).The selected strains could be tested against A. nidulans and A. versicolor, but specific trials are needed.…”
Section: Chemical and Biological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest successes to date have been achieved with this approach to reduce AF contamination in cotton (Cotty, 1994), peanuts (Dorner et al, 1998;Dorner, 2004Dorner, , 2008Pitt and Hocking, 2006) and more recently in maize (Abbas et al, 2006). Two products of nontoxigenic strains have received U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registration as biopesticides to control AF contamination in cotton and peanuts in several states of the USA (Dorner, 2004).The selected strains could be tested against A. nidulans and A. versicolor, but specific trials are needed.…”
Section: Chemical and Biological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SNP also exists in several other VCGs, but the distribution among other strains of YV36 other than AF36 is unknown, and its stability in treated fields has not been examined. Molecular characterization of fungal biocontrol agents is desirable in order to monitor isolates postapplication, especially in the case of biological control agents that may persist for extended periods of time and are expected to contribute to long-term biocontrol strategies (28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the non-toxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus could be used to displace toxigenic strains and reduce aflatoxin contamination. Their bio-control potential has already been provedin various studies (Dorner, 2004;Cardwell and Henry, 2004;Abbas et al, 2006;Pitt and Hocking, 2006;Dorner, 2008;Yin et al, 2008;Tran-Dinh et al, 2013 andPitt et al, 2015). Similarly, Azziz et al (1997) In a very similar study by Roy et al (2008), the antagonistic interaction between toxigenic strains of A. flavus and co-existing fungi of maize rhizosphere was observed.…”
Section: Figs 2-7 Showing Interactions Of Various Antagonistic Fungmentioning
confidence: 93%