2015
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00738-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis of the Aspergillus flavus Vegetative Compatibility Group to Which a Biological Control Agent That Limits Aflatoxin Contamination in U.S. Crops Belongs

Abstract: Some filamentous fungi in Aspergillus section Flavi produce carcinogenic secondary compounds called aflatoxins. Aflatoxin contamination is routinely managed in commercial agriculture with strains of Aspergillus flavus that do not produce aflatoxins. These non-aflatoxin-producing strains competitively exclude aflatoxin producers and reshape fungal communities so that strains with the aflatoxin-producing phenotype are less frequent. This study evaluated the genetic variation within naturally occurring atoxigenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
6
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in haplotype H39, an A. parasiticus isolate from Argentina groups with global A. flavus isolates. Interestingly, haplotype H47 includes the AF36 biocontrol strain, and despite being sampled from different geographic regions (Arizona, USA; Texas, USA; Karnataka, India), all four of the nonaflatoxigenic strains in this haplotype have the same nonsense mutation in aflC (data not shown), which suggests dispersal that transcends geographic boundaries as reported in other studies (Grubisha & Cotty, 2015; Ortega‐Beltran, Grubisha, Callicott, & Cotty, 2016). Moreover, many nonaflatoxigenic A. flavus L isolates, from various localities, group with A. oryzae .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For example, in haplotype H39, an A. parasiticus isolate from Argentina groups with global A. flavus isolates. Interestingly, haplotype H47 includes the AF36 biocontrol strain, and despite being sampled from different geographic regions (Arizona, USA; Texas, USA; Karnataka, India), all four of the nonaflatoxigenic strains in this haplotype have the same nonsense mutation in aflC (data not shown), which suggests dispersal that transcends geographic boundaries as reported in other studies (Grubisha & Cotty, 2015; Ortega‐Beltran, Grubisha, Callicott, & Cotty, 2016). Moreover, many nonaflatoxigenic A. flavus L isolates, from various localities, group with A. oryzae .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, atoxigenic phenotypes are highly stable. This has been demonstrated over decades in agroecosystems experimentally (Grubisha and Cotty, 2015;Ortega-Beltran et al, 2016). Stability even extends over evolutionary time (Adhikari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Recombination Between Atoxigenic and Toxigenic Vcgs In Naturmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is because hybridisation between toxigenic and atoxigenic isolates of A. flavus in laboratory crosses was shown to produce progenies with either no aflatoxin-production or lower aflatoxin production than the aflatoxin-producing parent (Olarte et al, 2012). Although Olarte et al (2012) suggest sexual recombination is common in A. flavus populations, including VCG YV36, to which AF36 belongs, after more than a decade of commercial use of AF36, dangerous recombinants have not been observed (Grubisha and Cotty, 2015). Farmers have used AF36 on more than a million hectares without adverse effect in Arizona, California, and Texas.…”
Section: Recombination Between Atoxigenic and Toxigenic Vcgs In Naturmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations