Two acholeplasmas recovered from contaminated cell cultures or commercial fetal bovine serum were found to be similar in biochemical and serological properties. The organisms, although not requiring serum or cholesterol for growth, did require a supplement of 0.5% albumin and 10 pg of palmitic acid per ml to a serum-free medium for sustained growth in the absence of sterols. The growth of both organisms was inhibited in medium containing 20% horse serum, although smaller amounts of horse serum or 20% fetal bovine serum did not exert inhibitory effects. The two strains possessed biochemical properties typical of other nonsterol-requiring members of the Mycoplaamatales, and they were serologically distinct from seven established Acholeplasma species. On the basis of these findings and other morphological, biological, and serological properties of the organisms, it is proposed that these organisms represent a new species, Acholeplasma morum. Strain 72-043 (=ATCC 33211) is the type strain.The acholeplasmas are a group of non-sterolrequiring members of the Mycoplasmatales found in a large number of hosts and in some plants (25). Currently, seven species of Acholeplasma are recognized. The acholeplasmas differ from other members of the Mycoplasmatales in a number of molecular, genetic, and biochemical characteristics (3, 12, 15-18, 20), whereas individual Acholeplasma species are differentiated on a limited number of biochemical properties and upon serological characteristics (25).In 1970, Schwobel and Leach (23) reported the recovery of a non-sterol-requiring organism (strain S2) from a primary bovine kidney cell culture. This cytopathic organism was found to be serologically distinct from Acholeplasma laidlawii (then known as Mycoplasma laidlawii) and from a number of other members of the Mycoplasmatales found in contaminated cell cultures or in bovine hosts. The S2 strain was examined subsequently in our laboratory in Bethesda, Md., and was found to be serologically unrelated to A . laidlawii, Acholeplasma gram ularum, or other newly established Acholeplasma species. In 1972, one of us (R.A.DG.) recovered an untypable acholeplasma from a bottle of commercial fetal bovine serum. This strain (72-043) was also found to be serologically distinct from all of the established species o f Acholeplasma represented in the Bethesda laboratory. Several years later, comparative tests on a number of unclassified acholeplasmas in our collection indicated not only that the S2 and 72-043 strains were serologically related, but also that they shared a number of other growth and biochemical characteristics. In view of some of the known difficulties in separating acholeplasmas by current serological techniques (25), in particular the preparation of a potent and specific antiserum, we felt that the S2 and 72-043 strains should be subjected to nucleic acid hybridization comparisons with other species of Acholeplasma. The results of this comparison (2) indicated that these two strains were clearly related to each other but were distinct ...