2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.emospa.2010.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

My profile: The ethics of virtual ethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, they suggest, we need to 'find a more nuanced way of thinking through the interactions of mediated and physical action, as online and offline interactions are constituted and constructed together to sustain and transform the complex temporalities and spatialities of everyday urban life' (2406). Unfortunately, we found that in much of the literature on online research methods, the virtual-material interface itself was not problematized and the researcher's position was assumed to be largely that of a disembodied, outside observer (Keller and Lee 2003;Driscoll and Gregg 2010;Eichhorn 2001). Unfortunately, we found that in much of the literature on online research methods, the virtual-material interface itself was not problematized and the researcher's position was assumed to be largely that of a disembodied, outside observer (Keller and Lee 2003;Driscoll and Gregg 2010;Eichhorn 2001).…”
Section: Toward a Virtual-materials Positionalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Rather, they suggest, we need to 'find a more nuanced way of thinking through the interactions of mediated and physical action, as online and offline interactions are constituted and constructed together to sustain and transform the complex temporalities and spatialities of everyday urban life' (2406). Unfortunately, we found that in much of the literature on online research methods, the virtual-material interface itself was not problematized and the researcher's position was assumed to be largely that of a disembodied, outside observer (Keller and Lee 2003;Driscoll and Gregg 2010;Eichhorn 2001). Unfortunately, we found that in much of the literature on online research methods, the virtual-material interface itself was not problematized and the researcher's position was assumed to be largely that of a disembodied, outside observer (Keller and Lee 2003;Driscoll and Gregg 2010;Eichhorn 2001).…”
Section: Toward a Virtual-materials Positionalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such experiences suggest that, while social media platforms might offer the potential for mutual recognition, they are structured by a number of significant constraints on the conditions for doing so. In particular our online approach to public engagement was in fact taking place through subtle, ambiguous interrelations between what were notionally perceived as separate public and private spheres (Delli Carpini ; Driscoll and Gregg ; Zimmer ), and across open and ‘proprietary ecologies’ (Donovan ). Thus, it remained an unresolved question among the team as to whether the individual esteem measures embedded in this ‘like economy’ (Gerlitz and Helmond ) might be distorting, obscuring or giving the illusion of mutual recognition, rather than constituting the fundamental social conditions under which mutual recognition might occur (Couldry et al .…”
Section: Going Public With the Creating Hackney As Home Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews are carried out offline in the form of discussion, chat, question and answer and chat with informants as the subject under study (Driskell and Lyon, 2002;Sade-Beck, 2004;Driscoll and Gregg, 2010;Shumar and Madison, 2013;Angelone, 2018). Researchers mainly use chat on WhatsApp to do intensive online interviews.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%