2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutualistic and Adaptive Human-Machine Collaboration Based on Machine Learning in an Injection Moulding Manufacturing Line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, regarding the use of the adaptability capability to improve human factors, the majority of works have been focusing on physical ergonomics, and especially on measuring the status of the operator. Indeed, works such as (Bragança et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2021;Bettoni et al, 2020) developed systems to measure the physical (and mental) workload on the human operator, and based on this information the cobot dynamically adapts to him/her, by taking physically demanding tasks (Peternel et al, 2018) , or by bringing the operator into a suitable ergonomic working pose (Kim et al, 2021) . It should be noted that the majority of this methods are also adopted to reduce the mental workload on the operator, as seen in Faber et al, 2017) .…”
Section: Human Factors and Cobot Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, regarding the use of the adaptability capability to improve human factors, the majority of works have been focusing on physical ergonomics, and especially on measuring the status of the operator. Indeed, works such as (Bragança et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2021;Bettoni et al, 2020) developed systems to measure the physical (and mental) workload on the human operator, and based on this information the cobot dynamically adapts to him/her, by taking physically demanding tasks (Peternel et al, 2018) , or by bringing the operator into a suitable ergonomic working pose (Kim et al, 2021) . It should be noted that the majority of this methods are also adopted to reduce the mental workload on the operator, as seen in Faber et al, 2017) .…”
Section: Human Factors and Cobot Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature reduced the perceived response time, improving the trust in the system; moreover, the authors stated that communication is fundamental to improve the sense of safety. Connectivity is also used to adapt the other elements of automation composing the system to the operator and improve the physical ergonomics and mental workload, as seen in (Bettoni et al, 2020) . Lastly, other forms of nonverbal communication towards the operator are based on the motion of the cobot, as seen in (Terzioglu et al, 2020) , where the authors adopted arm motions and hand gestures (with the gripper) to develop a non-verbal communication used to increase the sense of trust and acceptance.…”
Section: Human Factors and Cobot Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several past studies suggested that the activities of automation would replace human labor [5], other studies revealed that the knowledge worker and machine will complement each other [24][25][26]. Very little of the existing literature could highlight how knowledge workers' activities and automation have changed the entire structure of the organization.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study revealed that automation can substitute humans but also provide a contribution to the process of human labor to enhance human skills, providing a new interconnectedness that eases the flow of knowledge. The humanmachine interface has a high potential for improving employees' knowledge by syncing with the Internet of things devices to give new insight to information and data which boosts human efficiency [24]. The human-machine interface provides an atmosphere easy for the transfer of knowledge [25].…”
Section: Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrinkage behavior of plastic parts is related to many factors such as processing equipment, material properties, mold structure, plastic parts geometry, and injection molding process parameters [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. For gears whose dimensions have been determined in practical production, the key concern is the influence of injection molding process parameters on shrinkage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%