2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Solubilities of Ammonium-Based Ionic Liquids with Water and with Water/Methanol Mixture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Comparison of the [N( 6)222][Tf 2 N] Table 3 result with a literature value obtained from the volumetric method at 30 °C produces a −71% difference (57.8 vs 200 μmol/mol). 23 All of these differences are consistent with differences reported in the literature for imidazolium-ILs that may result from the difficulty in measuring low ILs solubilities. 12 The ammonium literature comparison in the previous paragraph necessitated the use of temperatures that varied from our test conditions (22 and 30 °C vs 25 °C).…”
Section: ■ Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Comparison of the [N( 6)222][Tf 2 N] Table 3 result with a literature value obtained from the volumetric method at 30 °C produces a −71% difference (57.8 vs 200 μmol/mol). 23 All of these differences are consistent with differences reported in the literature for imidazolium-ILs that may result from the difficulty in measuring low ILs solubilities. 12 The ammonium literature comparison in the previous paragraph necessitated the use of temperatures that varied from our test conditions (22 and 30 °C vs 25 °C).…”
Section: ■ Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Comparing the mole fraction result for [N(1)­444]­[Tf 2 N] in Table with the literature value obtained using this same dilution conductivity method results in a −81% difference (27.3 vs 140 μmol/mol) . Comparison of the [N(6)­222]­[Tf 2 N] Table result with a literature value obtained from the volumetric method at 30 °C produces a −71% difference (57.8 vs 200 μmol/mol) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Xu et al [22] achieved the LLE data for the mixtures (ethyl acetate + TFP + water) and (isopropyl acetate+ TFP + water). Until now, ionic liquid (ILs) have been adopted to separate alcohols from its aqueous mixtures due to the advantages of good thermal, chemical stability and recyclable [23][24][25][26]. However, there have been no literatures reported the LLE data about the separation of (TFP + water) with ILs as extractants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. To the best of our knowledge there are only few reports providing the mutual solubilities of non-aromatic and non-cyclic ammonium-based 32 or phosphonium-based 33 ILs with water, and mutual solubilities between water and sulfonium-based ILs are here reported for the first time. From the obtained temperature-dependence solubility data, the thermodynamic properties of a solution of diethylmethylsulfonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ) (at the IL-rich phase) were also derived and discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1. To the best of our knowledge there are only few reports providing the mutual solubilities of non-aromatic and non-cyclic ammoniumbased 32 or phosphonium-based 33 2 ]) (at the ILrich phase) were also derived and discussed. In addition, two different computational approaches, namely COSMO-RS and NPA calculations, were performed aiming at gathering a broader picture behind the IL-water interactions which dominate the liquid-liquid phase behaviour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%