Abstract:Background Studies indicate that incivility is common in nursing education and perpetuated by both students and faculty. Academic incivility negatively affects the well-being of those involved, interferes with the teaching–learning process, and is antithetical to nursing as a caring profession. An understanding of academic incivility is essential to establish best practices to address this problem. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine incivility in nursing academia from the perspective of baccalaur… Show more
“…Students, faculty members, and health professionals are professionally required to commit themselves to building respectful and appropriate learning/working environments that promote effective communication and collaboration [ 45 ]. Learning about mutual respect in cyberspace is a good starting point for addressing incivility and establishing a safe and supportive learning environment [ 46 ].…”
Many nursing students have experienced negative social behaviors and incivility in cyberspace. We aimed to explore knowledge, experience, and acceptability of cyberincivility, as well as the perceived benefits of cybercivility education among nursing students in the United States of America (USA), Hong Kong (HK), and South Korea (K). We used a cross-sectional study design. The Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire was administered to participants, and data were collected from 336 nursing students from a university in each country (USA (n = 90), HK (n = 115), and K (n = 131)). Cyberincivility was perceived as a problem by 76.8% of respondents. More than 50% of respondents had experienced cyberincivility, were knowledgeable about it, and found it unacceptable. Longer hours spent on social networking services and perception of cyberincivility were positively associated with the variables, but negatively associated with perceived benefits of learning. Cross-country differences in items and level of variables were identified (p < 0.01). The HK respondents demonstrated lower knowledge, compared to USA and K respondents. Frequency of cyberincivility experience and perceived learning benefit were lower for students in the USA than in HK and K. Acceptability of cyberincivility was significantly lower in respondents from K. Developing educational programs on general and sociocultural patterns of online communication could be useful in promoting cybercivility globally.
“…Students, faculty members, and health professionals are professionally required to commit themselves to building respectful and appropriate learning/working environments that promote effective communication and collaboration [ 45 ]. Learning about mutual respect in cyberspace is a good starting point for addressing incivility and establishing a safe and supportive learning environment [ 46 ].…”
Many nursing students have experienced negative social behaviors and incivility in cyberspace. We aimed to explore knowledge, experience, and acceptability of cyberincivility, as well as the perceived benefits of cybercivility education among nursing students in the United States of America (USA), Hong Kong (HK), and South Korea (K). We used a cross-sectional study design. The Academic Cyberincivility Assessment Questionnaire was administered to participants, and data were collected from 336 nursing students from a university in each country (USA (n = 90), HK (n = 115), and K (n = 131)). Cyberincivility was perceived as a problem by 76.8% of respondents. More than 50% of respondents had experienced cyberincivility, were knowledgeable about it, and found it unacceptable. Longer hours spent on social networking services and perception of cyberincivility were positively associated with the variables, but negatively associated with perceived benefits of learning. Cross-country differences in items and level of variables were identified (p < 0.01). The HK respondents demonstrated lower knowledge, compared to USA and K respondents. Frequency of cyberincivility experience and perceived learning benefit were lower for students in the USA than in HK and K. Acceptability of cyberincivility was significantly lower in respondents from K. Developing educational programs on general and sociocultural patterns of online communication could be useful in promoting cybercivility globally.
“…More recently, it has come to light that not only is experiencing bullying an issue but witnessing it is also problematic (Báez-León et al, 2016;MacCurtain et al, 2018). While in this paper we focus on the experience of students, it is important to note that nursing faculty may also experience bullying or incivility (Gazza, 2009;Small et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Magnitude and Impact Of Bullying In Practice And Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, 89% of surveyed nursing students in a Canadian school of nursing reported experiencing bullying (Clarke et al, 2012). A 2019 study of Canadian nursing students likewise found that 87% felt that "incivility" in nursing education was a problem (Small et al, 2019). Bishop (2004) conducted a qualitative analysis of the experiences of practising nurses while Hunt and Marini (2012) looked specifically at the experiences of clinical instructors.…”
Section: The Magnitude and Impact Of Bullying In Practice And Educationmentioning
“…Several scholars concur that bullying begins during undergraduate nursing education and continues to thrive in nursing practice. [6,9,[11][12][13][14] Undergraduate nursing students are expected to complete a minimum amount of clinical practice hours as part of their undergraduate nursing program. For example, in Australia, nursing students must undertake a minimum of 800 clinical placement hours in their undergraduate nursing program.…”
Bullying is a major concern in the nursing profession because of its implications for patients’ safety, the health of nurses and nursing students, as well as on the workforce in the healthcare system. The purpose of the study was to explain the incidence and state of bullying experienced by nursing students in the undergraduate nursing program during clinical practice. Fifty-five undergraduate nursing students participated in the mixed methods research conducted in a tertiary institution in Western Canada. Participants completed an online survey and an individual interview. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics while thematic analysis was employed for the open-ended questions on the survey and individual interviews. The findings from the study showed that a small number of students four (7.7%) frequently experienced bullying in the clinical setting with clinical instructors and practicing nurses being the main perpetrators. Students reported anxiety connected with going for clinical practice however a unique finding from this study was that the affected students continued to go for clinical practice and decided to remain in the program because of their goal to become registered nurses. Peers from the program were one of the key support systems for the students when they experienced the negative behavior. Irrespective of the low incidence of bullying at the research site, the impact of the behavior aligns with the literature. The findings from this study has the potential to inform clinical practices and policies in undergraduate nursing programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.