2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual interference between memory encoding and motor skills: the influence of motor expertise

Annalena Monz,
Kathrin Morbe,
Markus Klein
et al.

Abstract: In cognitive–motor dual-task situations, the extent of performance decrements is influenced by the attentional requirements of each task. Well-learned motor skills should be automatized, leading to less interference. This study presents two studies combining an episodic memory encoding task with well-practiced motor tasks in athletes. Study 1 asked 40 rowers (early teenagers to middle adulthood) to row on ergometers at slow or fast speeds. In study 2, Taekwondo athletes (n = 37) of different skill levels perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest the exact opposite: in the course of learning, the importance of cognitive processes for performing actually increases. This refutes traditional automaticity frameworks [8,22] and confirms more recent findings from movement sciences [26,27]. Since the learning time was very On the other hand, the time-variant associations between response pad performance and cognito-motor skills, which plateaued around trial 15, were probably fully captured.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest the exact opposite: in the course of learning, the importance of cognitive processes for performing actually increases. This refutes traditional automaticity frameworks [8,22] and confirms more recent findings from movement sciences [26,27]. Since the learning time was very On the other hand, the time-variant associations between response pad performance and cognito-motor skills, which plateaued around trial 15, were probably fully captured.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For example, manual gear shifting appears to be a controlled process well beyond the first year of driving a car [25]. Similar results were found for rowing, which requires cognitive monitoring not only for beginners but also for top athletes with more than 10 years of training [26,27]. Further, the execution of simple discrete finger sequences practiced several hundred times cannot be regarded as automatic [15].…”
Section: Cognitive Contributions Of Motor Sequence Learningmentioning
confidence: 61%