2018
DOI: 10.1049/el.2018.1332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual coupling reduction in multilayer patch antennas via meander line parasites

Abstract: A method to reduce the mutual coupling in wide-band multilayer patch array operating in C band is presented. The proposed device use conveniently sized meander line parasites printed on the same substrate of the upper patch. Measurements on a 2 × 2 prototype shows a measured bandwidth of about 19.6% centred at 5.1 GHz, therefore adequate to cover the whole WLAN frequency range. The meander lines allow to reduce the patch mutual coupling by about 2.4 dB.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various research works have been conducted to study the mutual coupling effect in an array and various techniques have been proposed to reduce the mutual coupling . Parasitic patches and parasitic meander line, soft or hard surfaces, defected ground structure, bandgap structure, metamaterial, and electromagnetic three‐dimensional (3D) wall are a few techniques proposed in the literature to reduce mutual coupling by blocking or minimizing surface current flow. These techniques are in common practice and easier to fabricate (if planar); however, they are complex to comprehend and design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research works have been conducted to study the mutual coupling effect in an array and various techniques have been proposed to reduce the mutual coupling . Parasitic patches and parasitic meander line, soft or hard surfaces, defected ground structure, bandgap structure, metamaterial, and electromagnetic three‐dimensional (3D) wall are a few techniques proposed in the literature to reduce mutual coupling by blocking or minimizing surface current flow. These techniques are in common practice and easier to fabricate (if planar); however, they are complex to comprehend and design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is artificial electromagnetic material, which contains electromagnetic bandgap [2], frequency selective surface [3], metasurface [4,5], defected ground structure [6][7][8][9], and array-antenna decoupling surface [10]. The second type is resonant structure [11,12], which is employed to decouple antenna arrays at certain frequencies based on its resonant characteristic. The last one is to introduce a decoupling network [13,14] to create extra currents to cancel out the coupled ones, and it is often adopted for dual-band cases [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous approaches to improve the isolation between close radiators. Some of these techniques are polarisation diversity [8], insertion of defected ground structures (DGS) [2,7,[9][10][11][12][13], parasitic elements [14], electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures and metamaterials [3,5,[15][16][17], neutralisation lines [10], and coupling-decoupling networks for each pair of antennas [18,19]. These methods are often combined to obtain better MIMO attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%