2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2019.0570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characteristic mode analysis applied to reduce the mutual coupling of a four‐element patch MIMO antenna using a defected ground structure

Abstract: A multiple‐input–multiple‐output (MIMO) microstrip patch antenna array of four elements is proposed to cover the 5.8 GHz WLAN band. The characteristic mode analysis is carried out to design a defected ground structure that improves the MIMO performance without impacting negatively the radiation characteristics of the four‐element array. Simulations and measurements demonstrate that the implemented prototype reaches a maximum mutual coupling of −32 dB and a gain‐per‐element of 5.3 dB with good MIMO attributes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ECC is devoted to elaborate the isolated degree of signal channels between antenna array elements and the DG can reveal the impact of diversity on communication system. For two‐port antenna, ECC and DG can be determined using the following equation with S ‐parameters 17 ECCgoodbreak=||S11*S12goodbreak+S21*S222()1goodbreak−()S112goodbreak+S212()1goodbreak−()S222goodbreak+S122 DG can be calculated by ECC, 18 and the expression is displayed as follows: DGgoodbreak=101ECC2 …”
Section: Antenna Parameters Analysis and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECC is devoted to elaborate the isolated degree of signal channels between antenna array elements and the DG can reveal the impact of diversity on communication system. For two‐port antenna, ECC and DG can be determined using the following equation with S ‐parameters 17 ECCgoodbreak=||S11*S12goodbreak+S21*S222()1goodbreak−()S112goodbreak+S212()1goodbreak−()S222goodbreak+S122 DG can be calculated by ECC, 18 and the expression is displayed as follows: DGgoodbreak=101ECC2 …”
Section: Antenna Parameters Analysis and Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECC (ρ e ) is a typical parameter that can reveal the correlation of the antenna array elements, so is DG. They can be represented as [9] ρ e = |S * 11…”
Section: Diversity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, various decoupling technologies have been presented and can be divided into three general categories. The first type is artificial electromagnetic material, which contains electromagnetic bandgap [2], frequency selective surface [3], metasurface [4,5], defected ground structure [6][7][8][9], and array-antenna decoupling surface [10]. The second type is resonant structure [11,12], which is employed to decouple antenna arrays at certain frequencies based on its resonant characteristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the mutual coupling, various methods have been proposed. These attempts include the use of decoupling and matching networks [5], neutralization line [6,7], parasitic branches [8,9], electromagnetic bandgap [10][11][12], and a defected ground structure (DGS) [3,4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] to limit the surface wave. On the one hand, the DGS structure is popularly adopted due to its unique characteristics of slow-wave propagation, which contributes to miniaturization of the antenna.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, different shapes of DGS have been proposed to reduce the mutual coupling between antenna elements. In [3,4,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19], different decoupling structures were employed between two symmetrically placed antenna elements to suppress the E-plane surface waves which are H-shaped, folded split-ring resonators, as well as complementary split-ring resonators, rectangular strip and spiral type. Meanwhile, studies by [18,19] referred to reducing the mutual coupling of dual frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%