2001
DOI: 10.1002/humu.1180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation detection in the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene (PI) using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Abstract: A method for mutation detection in the alpha-1 antitrypsin gene (protease inhibitor 1; PI) has been developed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified gene fragments. Using this experimental approach, all common phenotypes and mutations could be detected. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was compared with standard isoelectric focusing (IEF) in 20 potential a1-antitrypsin deficient patients and their relatives. The genotype determined by DGGE was found to be more reliable in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although standard diagnostic serology procedures, relying on IEF of serum AAT, have proven to be efficient to date, a previous study comparing DGGE to IEF showed this method of genotyping to be highly conclusive compared to only 85% efficiency of IEF [Lodewyckx et al, 2001]. The major disadvantage of using IEF is that AAT variants are not always distinguishable due to insufficient differences in gel migration patterns as a result of minor charge changes [Nukiwa et al, 1987].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although standard diagnostic serology procedures, relying on IEF of serum AAT, have proven to be efficient to date, a previous study comparing DGGE to IEF showed this method of genotyping to be highly conclusive compared to only 85% efficiency of IEF [Lodewyckx et al, 2001]. The major disadvantage of using IEF is that AAT variants are not always distinguishable due to insufficient differences in gel migration patterns as a result of minor charge changes [Nukiwa et al, 1987].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Of the PCR gelbased pre-screening techniques of mutation detection currently available, DGGE is believed to be the most powerful provided the assay is designed using optimal conditions of primer design [Wu et al, 1998] and gel conditions [Hayes et al, 1999]. The advantage of using the described assay, as opposed to that reported by Lodewyckx et al [2001], is the use of broad-range DGGE, thus making it more cost-effective and highthroughput.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Genotyping is also currently in use, particularly for the detection of deficiency variants. This standard method is not always accurate, because the phenotypes determined by IEF and by a 1 -AT serum concentration vary due to external factors such as inflammation and injury (Lodewyckx et al 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include RFLP (Restriction of Fragment Length Polymorphism) [21][22][23], SSCP (Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism) [24] and DGGE (Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis) [25], based on the comparative analysis of electrophoresis profiles of DNA fragments, which have different sizes depending on the alleles present. The allelespecific PCR is also commonly used, possibly in multiplex [26]; amplification and hybridization kits with PI S and PI Z allele-specific labelled probes are also marketed [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%