1998
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation and expression analysis of the putative prostate tumour-suppressor gene PTEN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
126
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
126
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the detection of these mutations required the cloning of PCR products obtained from tumor DNA and the sequencing of individual clones. The failure of three other groups to detect MXI1 mutations may well be due to the fact that DNA analyses were performed on the uncloned PCR-ampli®ed population of molecules (Gray et al, 1995;Kawamata et al, 1996;Kuczyk et al, 1998).…”
Section: Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the detection of these mutations required the cloning of PCR products obtained from tumor DNA and the sequencing of individual clones. The failure of three other groups to detect MXI1 mutations may well be due to the fact that DNA analyses were performed on the uncloned PCR-ampli®ed population of molecules (Gray et al, 1995;Kawamata et al, 1996;Kuczyk et al, 1998).…”
Section: Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,15,[93][94][95] Comprehensive surveys of various human cancers for PTEN deletion or mutation reveal that functional loss of PTEN frequently occurs in a wide spectrum of human cancers (reviewed in Vivanco and Sawyers, 2002 6 ). In prostate cancer, at least three mechanisms have been identified for functional loss of PTEN: chromosome deletion or loss of heterozygosity (LOH), [96][97][98][99][100][101] somatic mutations 95,[99][100][101][102][103] and epigenetic aberrations. 104,105 The majority of human prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts that have been evaluated show inactivation of the PTEN tumor-suppressor gene.…”
Section: Genetic Perturbation and Dysregulation Of The Pi3-k-akt Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deletion of this region has been repeatedly demonstrated by cytogenetic examination; for example, deletions were detected in 8 of 89 short-term cultures of prostate carcinomas (Arps et al, 1993;Lundgren et al, 1992). Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis has also shown deletions in the 10q23 ± 25 region, occurring in 20 ± 62% of prostate tumors, especially those that are of advanced stage (Bergerheim et al, 1991;Cunningham et al, 1996;Gray et al, 1995;Lacombe et al,1996;Trybus et al, 1996). In one of these studies, the deletion was de®ned at the 10q23 ± 24 boundary (Gray et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis has also shown deletions in the 10q23 ± 25 region, occurring in 20 ± 62% of prostate tumors, especially those that are of advanced stage (Bergerheim et al, 1991;Cunningham et al, 1996;Gray et al, 1995;Lacombe et al,1996;Trybus et al, 1996). In one of these studies, the deletion was de®ned at the 10q23 ± 24 boundary (Gray et al, 1995). Introduction of human chromosome 10 into tumor cells of prostate resulted in the suppression of tumor growth or metastasis; 10q23 was within the region responsible for tumor or metastasis suppression (Murakami et al, 1996;Nihei et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%