2018
DOI: 10.1101/gad.314286.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutant TRP53 exerts a target gene-selective dominant-negative effect to drive tumor development

Abstract: Mutations in Trp53, prevalent in human cancer, are reported to drive tumorigenesis through dominant-negative effects (DNEs) over wild-type TRP53 function as well as neomorphic gain-of-function (GOF) activity. We show that five TRP53 mutants do not accelerate lymphomagenesis on a TRP53-deficient background but strongly synergize with c-MYC overexpression in a manner that distinguishes the hot spot Trp53 mutations. RNA sequencing revealed that the mutant TRP53 DNE does not globally repress wild-type TRP53 functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutations beyond six codons called the hotspot codons account for approximately 30% of all p53 mutations and influence the protein‐DNA interactions and also the conformation of the protein (Hermeking, 2012). Many p53 mutants are reported to disrupt p53 function and drive tumorigenesis by dominant‐negative effects over normal TP53 allele; that is, when a mutant allele not only lose its tumor‐suppressive activities but also interfere with the function of wild‐type p53 in a manner advantageous for neoplastic transformation (Aubrey et al, 2018; Merkle et al, 2017). Because the p53 protein functions as a tetrameric transcription factor, mono‐allelic mutation of the p53 gene is thought to inhibit the function of wild‐type p53 protein within a heterotetrameric complex (Kamada et al, 2016).…”
Section: P53 and Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations beyond six codons called the hotspot codons account for approximately 30% of all p53 mutations and influence the protein‐DNA interactions and also the conformation of the protein (Hermeking, 2012). Many p53 mutants are reported to disrupt p53 function and drive tumorigenesis by dominant‐negative effects over normal TP53 allele; that is, when a mutant allele not only lose its tumor‐suppressive activities but also interfere with the function of wild‐type p53 in a manner advantageous for neoplastic transformation (Aubrey et al, 2018; Merkle et al, 2017). Because the p53 protein functions as a tetrameric transcription factor, mono‐allelic mutation of the p53 gene is thought to inhibit the function of wild‐type p53 protein within a heterotetrameric complex (Kamada et al, 2016).…”
Section: P53 and Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major functional divergences in mitochondrial apoptotic pathways observed among animals 8,8082 mainly originated in the recruitment of paralogous actors from the same multigenic families reflecting the adaptive processes specific to each taxon, which lead ultimately to convergent evolutionary histories. Interestingly, this richness of the apoptotic genetic repertoire was suggested to be links to the persistence of stem cells in adults from different phyla 83,84 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TP53 is one of the most important genes in human cancer. It appears that p53 protein is critical for tumor suppression not during the acute responses to cellular stress, which is characterized by extensive apoptosis, but for the killing or silencing of the cancer initiating cells that have acquired oncogenic lesions driving the neoplastic transformation [ 23 ]. Moreover, p53 provides a major barrier to tumor progression and metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%