1981
DOI: 10.1002/bit.260231203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis testing in vitro

Abstract: SummaryThe development and validation of short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens are urgently needed if estimates of 7040% for environmentally induced cancer are valid. Several methods for in vitro testing have been described in microbial and mammalian cells. It is anticipated that a battery of tests will soon be available with a high degree of reproducibility and predictability for potential in vivo carcinogenesis. This review discusses those assays currently being implemented in mammalian cells includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a quantitative relationship between chemical-DNA adduct formation and biological effect, as measured by increased virus transformation frequency, has been demonstrated [Theall et al, 19821. Positive test results in the SHE-SA7 system generally agree with those obtained in bacterial and mammalian cell rnutagenesis assays [Casto, 1981b;Hatch et al, 1982bl and in vivo carcinogenesis assays [Casto, 1981a,b;Hatch et al, 1983b;Heidelberger et al, 19831. To test the utility of the SHE-SA7 assay as a reliable system for screening potential genotoxic agents, it is necessary to demonstrate reproducibility in experimental results both within and between laboratories. Recently, the intra-and interlaboratory reproducibility of this assay was investigated by testing nine model carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic compounds Schechtman et al, 19861. In the present study, diverse chemicals received under code were evaluated by two independent commercial laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, a quantitative relationship between chemical-DNA adduct formation and biological effect, as measured by increased virus transformation frequency, has been demonstrated [Theall et al, 19821. Positive test results in the SHE-SA7 system generally agree with those obtained in bacterial and mammalian cell rnutagenesis assays [Casto, 1981b;Hatch et al, 1982bl and in vivo carcinogenesis assays [Casto, 1981a,b;Hatch et al, 1983b;Heidelberger et al, 19831. To test the utility of the SHE-SA7 assay as a reliable system for screening potential genotoxic agents, it is necessary to demonstrate reproducibility in experimental results both within and between laboratories. Recently, the intra-and interlaboratory reproducibility of this assay was investigated by testing nine model carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic compounds Schechtman et al, 19861. In the present study, diverse chemicals received under code were evaluated by two independent commercial laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…(days) 5 10 25 SOLVENT MMS 50pg/ml 0.1 1 .o In the experiment shown in Table 1, the percentage of cell5 that initially contained Ad5 DNA with (1 2.5-30.0%) or without (8.3%) MMS pretreatment was higher than the with (0.5-1.5%) or without (0.3%) MMS Dretreatment. These results suggest that the Ad5 DNA fo;nd early after jnfection Was free Viral DNA that had not been integrated into the cellular genome.…”
Section: Time Of Incubationmentioning
confidence: 88%