2018
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9765804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muslims in a Post-9/11 America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because people automatically categorize the world into ingroups and outgroups, or "we" versus "they" (Tajfel and Turner 1979), and intergroup prejudice and hostility become more visceral and tribal in the face of threat, we theorize that ethnic minority groups that share the same national or religious characteristics as the terrorists should be the primary targets of intolerance. 7 As noted earlier, for example, after terror attacks by Islamic extremists, Arab and Muslim groups in the U.S. and elsewhere were viewed as the "enemy Other"-violent, threatening, foreign and unassimilable, and therefore deserving of constant surveillance and other forms of civil liberties restrictions (e.g., Gillum 2018, Jamal 2008Huddy et al 2005). Secondary targets of intolerance are likely to be fellow travelers who are sociologically dissimilar from terrorists but are perceived to be naïve sympathizers or "enablers" of either terrorist groups or associated domestic groups.…”
Section: Threat Identity and Tolerance Toward Fellow Travelersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because people automatically categorize the world into ingroups and outgroups, or "we" versus "they" (Tajfel and Turner 1979), and intergroup prejudice and hostility become more visceral and tribal in the face of threat, we theorize that ethnic minority groups that share the same national or religious characteristics as the terrorists should be the primary targets of intolerance. 7 As noted earlier, for example, after terror attacks by Islamic extremists, Arab and Muslim groups in the U.S. and elsewhere were viewed as the "enemy Other"-violent, threatening, foreign and unassimilable, and therefore deserving of constant surveillance and other forms of civil liberties restrictions (e.g., Gillum 2018, Jamal 2008Huddy et al 2005). Secondary targets of intolerance are likely to be fellow travelers who are sociologically dissimilar from terrorists but are perceived to be naïve sympathizers or "enablers" of either terrorist groups or associated domestic groups.…”
Section: Threat Identity and Tolerance Toward Fellow Travelersmentioning
confidence: 99%