2016
DOI: 10.14201/fjc201612149165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Museos y comunicación: los nuevos medios como herramienta de diálogo y sociabilidad de la institución. El uso de Twitter por el museo del Prado, museo Thyssen-Bornemisza y museo Reina Sofía

Abstract: Fecha de recepción del artículo: 22/04/2015 Fecha de aceptación definitiva: 24/12/2015 RESUMEN Los diversos cambios en el entorno político, económico y social han llevado al museo a una adaptación constante a lo largo de su historia para desarrollar su rol como institución social. De una concepción basada en el objeto, esta organización ha trasladado su foco al público, lo que ha llevado al museo a entender la necesidad de emplear la comunicación como herramienta estratégica para el diálogo con el público. En … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The social web and the 2.0 tools (more collaborative, multidirectional and dialogic) are offering museums new options and possibilities of communication and changing the way in which museums engage with their publics based on the active involvement and participation of the user. This allows the exchange of information, debate, discussion and collaboration (Crenn;Vidal, 2007;Lopez et al, 2010;Kidd, 2011;Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, 2012;Claes;Deltell, 2014), and contributes to create more participative channels of communication for this type of institutions (Lopez et al, 2010;Martínez-Sanz, 2012;Cordón-Benito;González-González, 2016). This explains why these platforms have become frequently applied in the communication strategies of museums (Marty, 2007;Simon, 2010; Capriotti; Pardo-Kuklinski, 2012; Cabrera-Bravo; Cabrejas-Almena, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social web and the 2.0 tools (more collaborative, multidirectional and dialogic) are offering museums new options and possibilities of communication and changing the way in which museums engage with their publics based on the active involvement and participation of the user. This allows the exchange of information, debate, discussion and collaboration (Crenn;Vidal, 2007;Lopez et al, 2010;Kidd, 2011;Cabezuelo-Lorenzo, 2012;Claes;Deltell, 2014), and contributes to create more participative channels of communication for this type of institutions (Lopez et al, 2010;Martínez-Sanz, 2012;Cordón-Benito;González-González, 2016). This explains why these platforms have become frequently applied in the communication strategies of museums (Marty, 2007;Simon, 2010; Capriotti; Pardo-Kuklinski, 2012; Cabrera-Bravo; Cabrejas-Almena, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para la consecución de los objetivos planteados se han elaborado en el marco de nuestra investigación dos instrumentos de evaluación: una entrevista semiestructurada a los responsables de la difusión informativa de los museos de la Región de Murcia y una rejilla de observación que nos permite recoger datos variados sobre la información que transmite el museo a través de las redes sociales y el grado de interacción que realiza con el usuario (Cordón y González, 2016), dado que resulta interesante saber la evolución que los centros museísticos han tenido con el uso de estas herramientas, pues otras investigaciones sostienen que la comunicación se plantea de manera unidireccional, con muy poca interacción (Dosdoce, 2013).…”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…Social networks offer an increasing number of ways to consume museums' cultural offering [14] as a means of sociocultural construction and as a tool for media coverage of cultural and historical heritage [15]. There is over a decade of work in this line of research in Spain [16][17][18][19][20][21], but web 2.0 heritage educommunication is a topic of international interest, as shown by studies from Italy [22][23][24], Denmark [25,26], Portugal [27], Greece [28], the United Kingdom [29,30], and the United States [31,32]. Likewise, there are world-renowned institutions that have produced various reports [33][34][35][36] that represent a starting point for this research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%