1989
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90230-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muscle fiber conduction velocity related to stimulation rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of diagonal lines joining times of onsets of the dominant component of each potential gave the velocity of conduction. A uniform velocity of ϳ4 m/s corresponds to a volley of action potentials conducted along a group of muscle fibers (Stålberg, 1966;Nishizono et al, 1989). A substantially faster apparent velocity, 40 -70 m/s, would correspond to records from muscle fibers activated by branches of an intramuscular nerve axon, as seen in the cat sartorius muscle (Loeb et al, 1987).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slope of diagonal lines joining times of onsets of the dominant component of each potential gave the velocity of conduction. A uniform velocity of ϳ4 m/s corresponds to a volley of action potentials conducted along a group of muscle fibers (Stålberg, 1966;Nishizono et al, 1989). A substantially faster apparent velocity, 40 -70 m/s, would correspond to records from muscle fibers activated by branches of an intramuscular nerve axon, as seen in the cat sartorius muscle (Loeb et al, 1987).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…duction velocity of nonactive motor units was not affected by ischemia for Յ13 min (Farina et al 2004a). Conduction velocity depends on the discharge rate (Farina et al 2004b;Nishizono et al 1989); thus a different discharge rate in C1 and C3 could have influenced the results. Discharge rate in C3 was Ͻ2 pps smaller than in C1 for both subject groups, and this difference was not significant.…”
Section: Membrane Properties Of Quiescent Muscle Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can be interpreted as due to the accumulation of metabolic byproducts in the muscle due to the activity of muscle fibers (26). However, average conduction velocity is affected by motor unit recruitment-derecruitment (1,17) and by the distribution of discharge rates (32); thus these studies do not provide a direct indication of the modifications of fiber membrane properties in single motor units with ischemia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%