1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.37.3153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muon spin rotation and magnetic order in the heavy-fermion compoundURu2Si2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…µSR measurements under applied pressure have also confirmed this first-order transition to the LMAF state, and demonstrate no pressure-dependence of the internal fields from 0.5-1.5 GP a [11]. In addition, µSR [12,13] and NMR measurements [14] show that the weak antiferromagnetic moment seen at ambient pressure can be explained by a small phase separated volume fraction of the pressure-induced antiferromagnetic state coexisting with the hidden order state. It is now widely accepted that this low moment antiferromagnetism is extrinsic to the hidden order state and is caused by inhomogeneous strain in measured crystals [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…µSR measurements under applied pressure have also confirmed this first-order transition to the LMAF state, and demonstrate no pressure-dependence of the internal fields from 0.5-1.5 GP a [11]. In addition, µSR [12,13] and NMR measurements [14] show that the weak antiferromagnetic moment seen at ambient pressure can be explained by a small phase separated volume fraction of the pressure-induced antiferromagnetic state coexisting with the hidden order state. It is now widely accepted that this low moment antiferromagnetism is extrinsic to the hidden order state and is caused by inhomogeneous strain in measured crystals [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The hidden order transition is given its name because, although roughly 0.2Rln2 of entropy is released at T 0 (clearly showing a phase transition to a new state for T ≤ T 0 ), intense experimental and theoretical efforts to uncover the order parameter have been unsuccessful: e.g. neutron scattering and μSR techniques yield ordered moments that are much too small to account for the entropy that is released at T 0 [4,5]. Considerable interest has also been paid to the superconducting state, which is clearly unconventional as evidenced by: (1) its occurrence deep inside the hidden order state [1][2][3], (2) the low carrier density from which it emerges [6,7], (3) the large upper critical field [8] and (4) measurements which suggest the presence of nodes in the superconducting energy gap [7,[9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i) The magnetic Bragg peak intensities were surprisingly small, corresponding to an ordered U moment of only µ ord ≈ (0.04 ± 0.01) µ B /U (neutrons) and µ ord ≈ (0.02 ± 0.01) µ B /U (x-rays). Muon spin rotation (µSR) measurements provided an ordered moment that was even an order of magnitude smaller (MacLaughlin et al, 1988).ii) The magnetic correlation lengths of about 400Å are not resolution limited, i.e., the magnetic order is not truly long-ranged. iii) The measured temperature dependence of the neutron and Bragg intensities does not resemble a typical order parameter curve with its convex T-behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%