2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/289687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mumps, Cervical Zoster, and Facial Paralysis: Coincidence or Association?

Abstract: The association of mumps with peripheral facial paralysis has been suggested, but its pathogenesis remains unclear. An 8-year-old girl simultaneously developed left peripheral facial paralysis, ipsilateral cervical herpes zoster, and bilateral mumps sialadenitis. Elevated anti-mumps and anti-varicella zoster virus IgM antibodies in serological testing indicated recent infection of mumps and reactivation of VZV. Molecular studies have provided mounting evidence that the mumps virus dysregulates the host's immun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An 8-year-old girl with cervical shingles, paralysis of the facial nerve and oedema of the right submandibular region was also described. However, not only IgM antibodies against VZV, but also against mumps virus were found in the child [ 12 ]. If the ultrasound image in our patient had only shown inflammation of the left submandibular gland, it could have been be assumed that it was an inflammatory reaction related to a bacterial infection in close anatomical area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An 8-year-old girl with cervical shingles, paralysis of the facial nerve and oedema of the right submandibular region was also described. However, not only IgM antibodies against VZV, but also against mumps virus were found in the child [ 12 ]. If the ultrasound image in our patient had only shown inflammation of the left submandibular gland, it could have been be assumed that it was an inflammatory reaction related to a bacterial infection in close anatomical area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%