2016
DOI: 10.1201/9781315382135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate Statistical Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
99
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of dimensions in a map is linked to the number of latent underlying factors in the dataset, similarly to other procedures like factor analysis. As a consequence, the optimal number of dimensions to represent the data is dependent on several factors: the number of variables in the model; the lack of fit (s-stress value), given the number of dimensions; an index of fit of the model (R 2 -value); and interpretability of the dimensions (18). Typically, R 2 -values of 0.8 or higher are considered acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of dimensions in a map is linked to the number of latent underlying factors in the dataset, similarly to other procedures like factor analysis. As a consequence, the optimal number of dimensions to represent the data is dependent on several factors: the number of variables in the model; the lack of fit (s-stress value), given the number of dimensions; an index of fit of the model (R 2 -value); and interpretability of the dimensions (18). Typically, R 2 -values of 0.8 or higher are considered acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spores measurements were statistically analyzed in SPSS (Ver 16) and minimum, maximum, mean values, and standard errors are obtained. The quantitative and qualitative traits were figured out for their capability to group taxa employing hierarchical clustering method (UPGMA) abbreviated as Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean), utilizing MVSP software version 3.2 (Manly & Alberto, 2016). Pairwise relationships were evaluated by Euclidean distance coefficients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher values for absolute coefficients for each particular variable determine better discriminating power. Afterward, data were standardized following the premises reported by Manly and Alberto [29], and Mahalanobis distances were calculated using the following formula:…”
Section: Canonical Coefficient and Loading Interpretation And Spatial Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%