1993
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-25-5-475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in French Large White and French Landrace pigs

Abstract: Summary -Genetic parameters of 7 traits measured in central test stations -average daily gain (ADG1), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and backfat thickness (ABT) measured on candidates for selection, and average daily gain (ADG2), dressing percentage (DP), estimated carcass lean content (ECLC) and meat quality index (MQI) 0,30; 0,6/,; 0,22; 0,52; 0,39; 0,60; 0,33 en race LW et 0,3l,; 0,56; 0,25; 0,l!6; 0,31; 0,68; 0,23

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
7
1
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
8
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the genetic standard deviation of LMP has increased from 1.50 to 2.26 for Landrace and from 1.67 to 3.02 for Duroc, which means that there is a considerably larger genetic variation for LMP measured with CT than measured with dissection. Estimated heritabilities for LMP in our study were consistent with the corresponding estimates (ranging from 0.41 to 0.68) reported by Ducos et al (1993), Sonesson et al (1998) and Gilbert et al (2007). All studies calculated an LMP based on a cutting procedure and the weight of lean meat for different premium cuts expressed as a percentage of the half carcass weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the genetic standard deviation of LMP has increased from 1.50 to 2.26 for Landrace and from 1.67 to 3.02 for Duroc, which means that there is a considerably larger genetic variation for LMP measured with CT than measured with dissection. Estimated heritabilities for LMP in our study were consistent with the corresponding estimates (ranging from 0.41 to 0.68) reported by Ducos et al (1993), Sonesson et al (1998) and Gilbert et al (2007). All studies calculated an LMP based on a cutting procedure and the weight of lean meat for different premium cuts expressed as a percentage of the half carcass weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This might have yielded overestimated heritability for ADG1 in Duroc, as this breed had a full-sib group size of 1.3 and also higher heritability for this trait than Landrace, which had a full-sib group size of 1.1. The heritabilities for growth in the testing station period (ADG2) were of the same magnitude (ranging from 0.30 to 0.52) as those reported by Ducos et al (1993), de Vries et al (1994 and Suzuki et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative genetic correlation between ADG1 and backfat measurements agrees with Hermesch et al (2000b), where pigs were fed ad libitum. The genetic correlations obtained in this study agree with literature values that were based on ad libitum feeding systems (Lo et al, 1992;Ducos et al, 1993;Mrode and Kennedy, 1993;Cameron and Curran, 1994).…”
Section: Fixed Factorssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) (Henderson, 1988) (Rothschild et al, 1979;Meyer and Thompson, 1984;Sorensen and Kennedy, 1984). It (Kennedy, 1990;Meyer, 1990Meyer, , 1991 (Hofer et al, 1992;Besbes, 1993;Ducos et al, 1993;Hagger, 1994;Mielenz et al, 1994;Poujardieu et al, 1994). As Among these selected females, the top 50% were selected for ES30 (first and second generations) or ES40 (third to fifth generations).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%