2012
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731111001455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters between slaughter pig efficiency and growth rate of different body tissues estimated by computed tomography in live boars of Landrace and Duroc

Abstract: In this study, computed tomography (CT) technology was used to measure body composition on live pigs for breeding purposes. Norwegian Landrace (L; n 5 3835) and Duroc (D; n 5 3139) boars, selection candidates to be elite boars in a breeding programme, were CT-scanned between August 2008 and August 2010 as part of an ongoing testing programme at Norsvin's boar test station. Genetic parameters in the growth rate of muscle (MG), carcass fat (FG), bone (BG) and non-carcass tissue (NCG), from birth to ,100 kg live … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heritabilities are, for both the breeds, lower (although more clear for Landrace) than the heritabilities reported by Gjerlaug-Enger et al (2011) on the same populations. They reported heritabilities for average daily gain from 25 to 100 kg using an animal model in the range of 0.41 to 0.42 for both the breeds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heritabilities are, for both the breeds, lower (although more clear for Landrace) than the heritabilities reported by Gjerlaug-Enger et al (2011) on the same populations. They reported heritabilities for average daily gain from 25 to 100 kg using an animal model in the range of 0.41 to 0.42 for both the breeds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…They reported heritabilities for average daily gain from 25 to 100 kg using an animal model in the range of 0.41 to 0.42 for both the breeds. The differences between breeds are more apparent in this study compared with the results of Gjerlaug-Enger et al (2011). A possible explanation is that the genetic correlation between test days is generally lower for the Landrace than for the Duroc, which makes that, for the Duroc, the heritability at a particular test day is closer to the overall heritability across the entire test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The size of the voxel is determined by the resolution of the CT device (Hounsfield, 1976). The device used for scanning was a General Electric 32 slice VTC LightSpeed scanner, which is further described by Gjerlaug-Enger et al (2012). Images were compressed and stored on an image server that can be accessed for further image processing.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boars were located at the Norsvin Delta testing station for boars described by GerlaugEnger et al [12] and Aasmundstad et al [13]. The pigs were CT scanned at 120 kg at the end of the testing period.…”
Section: Animal and Carcass Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%