1995
DOI: 10.1897/1552-8618(1995)14[209:mqmobh]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate QSBR Modeling of Biodehalogenation Half-Lives of Halogenated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

Abstract: Multivariate quantitative structure-biodegradability relationships (QSBRs) were developed for a series of 20 halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons investigated for their microbial biodehalogenation (expressed as half-lives). These QSBRs are based on a battery of quantum-chemical descriptors and the use of the multivariate data analytical techniques principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares projections to latent structures (PLS). The developed models are introduced and discussed from a multivari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No firm guidelines are available for the size of each cross validation subset (i.e., N ); however, Eriksson et al [46] recommend against the leave‐one‐out approach, in which each subset contains only one observation. In studies that did not use the leave‐one‐out approach, reported values for N range from one‐quarter to one‐ninth of the number of observations in the original training set [4,47]. For QSAR2, cross‐validation was performed using a 20% leave‐out (i.e., the training set was divided into 5 subsets, each subset containing 9 observations), as well as a leave‐one‐out approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No firm guidelines are available for the size of each cross validation subset (i.e., N ); however, Eriksson et al [46] recommend against the leave‐one‐out approach, in which each subset contains only one observation. In studies that did not use the leave‐one‐out approach, reported values for N range from one‐quarter to one‐ninth of the number of observations in the original training set [4,47]. For QSAR2, cross‐validation was performed using a 20% leave‐out (i.e., the training set was divided into 5 subsets, each subset containing 9 observations), as well as a leave‐one‐out approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), it is unreasonable to expect that a QSAR can predict the biotransformation rate constant of a compound with a high degree of accuracy. On the other hand, QSARs have been shown to be capable of producing an order‐of‐magnitude estimate of the biotransformation rate [3–5]. Additionally, QSARs provide valuable insight into the rate of biotransformation of a compound relative to other compounds with a similar structure [3,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLS methodology was applied to the original data set containing all biochemical effect values in matrix X and all population-level effects in matrix Y. The PLS simultaneously projects the X and Y variables onto the same subspace, in such a manner that a good relationship exists between the position of the observation in the X space and in the Y plane [10]. To that end, the model calculates the X score vector t, the Y score vector u, the X loading vector p, the X weight vector w, and the Y weight vector c. The vector t can be seen as the new variables that are used to predict the Y matrix, and the X and Y weights w and c indicate how the variables are combined to make t and u in order to express the quantitative relationship between X and Y.…”
Section: Pls Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within (eco)toxicological applications PLS has been used to establish quantitative structureactivity relationships (e.g., for pheromones [7], for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans [8] and for unsaturated dialdehydes [9]). Eriksson et al [10] developed multivariate quantitative structure-biodegradability relationships (QSBRs) for halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons. Andren et al [11] were able to create models for biological responses (toxicity tests with Microtox [Azure Environmental, Carlsbad, CA, USA] inhibition of nitrification, and algal growth inhibition with Selenastrum capricornutum) pinpointing the two major chemical groups (inorganic metals and organic pollutants grouped as adsorbable organic halogens, chemical oxygen demand, and total organic carbon) that caused toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, increasing use is made of semiempirical mathematical models, notably quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), that are able to model and predict which compounds are likely to degrade and which will withstand degradation. 3 - 8 Peijnenburg et al ' recently reported rate constants of reductive transformation (degradation) of a series of 17 halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons in anoxic sediment samples. These 17 compounds were previously selected to be representative of a larger series (numbering 58) of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%