1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199609)10:5/6<483::aid-cem446>3.3.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate QSAR modelling of the rate of reductive dehalogenation of haloalkanes

Abstract: The pseudo first-order rate constants for reductive dehalogenation under anoxic conditions have recently been reported for a series of halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons. in this paper it is shown that multivariate quantitative stnicture-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling of these data i s posible. Based on a training set of nine compounds and using hformation from 36 chemical and biological model systems, a QSAR was developed explaining 82% (R') and predicting 53% (e:,) of the variation in reductive dehal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model validity ( i.e. presence of chance-correlations between the variables and the responses) were determined via 100 permutation experiments [59] , [60] . PLS calculations were performed using the SIMCA software package [61] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model validity ( i.e. presence of chance-correlations between the variables and the responses) were determined via 100 permutation experiments [59] , [60] . PLS calculations were performed using the SIMCA software package [61] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLS regression coefficients were also robustness-tested by monitoring their variation throughout the cross validation procedure, which was important since the regression coefficients were used to established the SAR and to interpret the QSAR model. We also chose to perform a permutation test [ 38 , 39 ] to make sure that our model was not a result of chance correlations. In this test, the order of the response values (p IC 50 ) was scrambled and new models were created that should perform worse than the original model (in terms of R 2 Y and Q 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction error of external test molecules i.e., measured y versus the predicted y , or the root-mean error of prediction (RMSEP) was calculated according to where N is the number of molecules ( i ). Model validity and chance-correlations between X and Y were quantified with permutation experiments in SIMCA [ 63 ] where the order of p IC 50 -values in Y was scrambled 200 times and new PLS-models were created and compared to the original model [ 38 , 39 ]. Two kinds of regression models were derived by PLS calculations between the p IC 50 and (1) the conditional descriptor set and (2) the quantitative descriptors describing the 24 molecules, in the training set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, plots of observed responses versus calculated responses were studied and root-mean-square error of estimation (RMSEE) values were calculated. In addition, PLS models were investigated using a permutation methodology in which the order of values in y is randomized and a new model is calculated. , This was repeated 200 times for the two variables in Y , and plots were generated showing the correlation coefficients between the original y and the permuted y versus the cumulative R 2 and Q 2 values. The intercept ( R 2 and Q 2 when the correlation coefficient is zero) is a measure of the fit, that is, the significance of the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%