2015
DOI: 10.3189/2015jog14j168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate parameter optimization for computational snow avalanche simulation

Abstract: Snow avalanche simulation software is a commonly used tool for hazard estimation and mitigation planning. In this study a depth-averaged flow model, combining a simple entrainment and friction relation, is implemented in the software SamosAT. Computational results strongly depend on the simulation input, in particular on the employed model parameters. A long-standing problem is to quantify the influence of these parameters on the simulation results. We present a new multivariate optimization approach for avala… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the ratio of simulated snow depth in the Alpine3D point between the release and deposit area, the gradient in the layer depth of snow available for possible erosion was derived. The median gradient in this layer depth available for erosion for the 169 cases was found to be 0.7 m/km of elevation, congruent with earlier reported values of 0.8 m/km (Fischer et al, ). From the release and deposition snowpack simulations, linear gradients in snow temperature were derived and also provided to the RAMMS‐Extended model.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From the ratio of simulated snow depth in the Alpine3D point between the release and deposit area, the gradient in the layer depth of snow available for possible erosion was derived. The median gradient in this layer depth available for erosion for the 169 cases was found to be 0.7 m/km of elevation, congruent with earlier reported values of 0.8 m/km (Fischer et al, ). From the release and deposition snowpack simulations, linear gradients in snow temperature were derived and also provided to the RAMMS‐Extended model.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In yellow areas, enduring contacts, forming elastic networks between particles, are dominant (referred to as quasi-static regime in da Cruz et al, 2005;Berzi et al, 2011; Vescovi et al, 2013, or elastic-quasi-static regime in Campbell, 2002, 2005. In blue areas, collisional stresses are dominant (referred to as collisional regime in da Cruz et al, 2005;Vescovi et al, 2013;Berzi et al, 2011, kinetic regime in da Cruz et al, 2005Forterre and Pouliquen, 2008;Vescovi et al, 2013;Berzi et al, 2011, or inertial-collisional regime in Campbell, 2002, 2005. The flow is purely collisional for concentrations below the random loose package: ν < ν rlp .…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() or Fischer et al . (). Their application would be imperative, but represents a challenge due to the multi‐dimensional parameter space, including the spatial pattern in some parameters. Considering what was said in (1), systematic back‐calculations of multiple events may lead to a set of guiding parameter ranges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%