2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis of preoperative and postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an indicator of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings may not be generalizable to other populations with different treatment modalities and racial backgrounds. 18 , 19 , 20 , 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings may not be generalizable to other populations with different treatment modalities and racial backgrounds. 18 , 19 , 20 , 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence has shown that systemic inflammation plays an important role in different stages of tumor development, including initiation, promotion, malignant conversion, invasion, and metastasis. 6 , 7 Previous studies have confirmed that inflammatory biomarkers including preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), preoperative derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), preoperative monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), postoperative NLR, and difference in NLR before and after chemoradiotherapy (∆NLR) are associated with worse prognosis in various malignancies, 8 12 including esophageal cancer. 13 18 However, for ESCC undergoing nCRT, data regarding the relationship between pre- and post-treatment levels of inflammatory biomarkers and prognosis or adverse events was very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While disease stage is the single most predictive prognostic factor, there is still heterogeneity in outcomes within a single stage 5 . Current models for predicting survival and efficacy of therapy in head and neck cancer are still inadequate 6 . With growing diversity in treatment regimens available and an increased push to personalize therapy, there is a need to develop a robust repertoire of prognostic indicators to better predict therapeutic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%