2014
DOI: 10.5958/j.2348-7542.15.1.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multivariate analysis for evaluation and classification of toria germplasm accessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one absorbed and accounted for maximum proportion of total variability in the set of all PCs and the remaining ones accounted for progressively lesser and lesser amount of variation. Similar results have also been reported earlier by Zada et al (2013) in Ethiopian mustard; Avtar et al (2014) in toria and Neeru et al (2015) in Indian mustard. The analysis without rotation of axes failed to load all the variables signifying that it could not offer much information regarding the idea of correlation between the variables and the principal components.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one absorbed and accounted for maximum proportion of total variability in the set of all PCs and the remaining ones accounted for progressively lesser and lesser amount of variation. Similar results have also been reported earlier by Zada et al (2013) in Ethiopian mustard; Avtar et al (2014) in toria and Neeru et al (2015) in Indian mustard. The analysis without rotation of axes failed to load all the variables signifying that it could not offer much information regarding the idea of correlation between the variables and the principal components.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…leaf angle and siliqua angle and could be designated as angle factor. Avtar et al (2014) in toria and Singh et al (2014) in Indian mustard also reported loading of similar type of variables on a common principal factor (PF).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…PC-II had positive correlation (P < 0.05) with two variables (secondary branches, seed yield/plant) whereas, PC-III had positive correlation (P<0.05) with three variables (plant height, silique on main shoot, seed yield/plant). Similar results have also been reported earlier by Zada et al, (2013) in Ethiopian mustard; Avtar et al, (2014) in toria and Neeru et al, (2015) in Indian mustard.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The first principal component absorbed and accounted for maximum proportion of total variability in the set of all PCs and the remaining ones accounted for progressively lesser and lesser amount of variation. Similar results have also been reported earlier by Zada et al, (2013), Avtar et al, (2014Avtar et al, ( , 2017, Ray et al, (2014), Neeru et al, (2015) and Verma et al, (2016). The Varimax Rotation was applied to estimate correlation between the variables and the principal components.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysis Indicated That Only First Four Principal Components (Pcs)supporting
confidence: 90%