PsycEXTRA Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/e666642012-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multitheoretical Psychotherapy for Depression: Case Study One

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying which clinical hypotheses best describe a particular client’s depression provides a method for choosing specific intervention strategies that are likely to help a particular client. Case study research has begun to explore the feasibility of MTP-D (Harris et al, 2012). Future research using clinical trials will be necessary to establish the feasibility and efficacy of MTP-D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Identifying which clinical hypotheses best describe a particular client’s depression provides a method for choosing specific intervention strategies that are likely to help a particular client. Case study research has begun to explore the feasibility of MTP-D (Harris et al, 2012). Future research using clinical trials will be necessary to establish the feasibility and efficacy of MTP-D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent case study exploring the feasibility of MTP-D with a depressed woman in her early 60s illustrates this process of treatment planning (Harris, Kelley, & Slack, 2012). After the client described her depression in a general way, the psychotherapist conducted a multidimensional survey of thoughts, actions, feelings, and interpersonal relationships.…”
Section: Multitheoretical Psychotherapy For Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methodological pluralism is an early and sustained attempt at utilizing diverse approaches, but it may tend toward unreflective eclecticism through selecting techniques in an opportunistic manner, thereby risking charge of inconsistency. Attempts are underway to rectify this problem, and rationales have been produced for the disciplined selection of methods (for an analogy with regard to the development of integrative psychotherapy from more eclectic forms, see Brookes-Harris, 2008). Sechrest and Sidani (1995) suggest using formulaic (constrained by external and formal rules) and clinical (unconstrained and personal) approaches, similar to but not coterminous with quantitative and qualitative methods, as a check on each other.…”
Section: Eclecticismmentioning
confidence: 99%