Multitheoretical psychotherapy for depression: Integrating strategies from evidence-based practices.

Harris, Jeff E.; Kelley, Leslie J.; Shepard, LeAnne M.

doi:10.1037/a0039565

Cited by 5 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…RCT support across models fits with Shadish and Baldwin's (2003) metaanalytic finding of little difference in effectiveness across different theoretical models to couple therapy, which suggests that each treatment utilizes core principles or mechanisms of change. It also fits with the common integrationist assumption that different treatments target different change mechanisms, and that combining empirically supported treatments is likely to yield better treatment outcomes than one empirically supported treatment alone (e.g., Harris et al, 2015).…”

Section: Tenet 4: Principles Must Have An Empirical Basesupporting

confidence: 59%

“…'s () Integrative Systemic Therapy. Tenet 4 fits the zeitgeist of integrated treatments having an evidence base (e.g., Breunlin et al., ; Harris et al., ), and encourages building an evidence base for ESPs and other key types of research, while also considering diversity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, multiple levels of impact are captured in biopsychosocial models (e.g., Melchert, 2013), and Breunlin et al's (2011) Integrative Systemic Therapy. Tenet 4 fits the zeitgeist of integrated treatments having an evidence base (e.g., Breunlin et al, 2011;Harris et al, 2015), and encourages building an evidence base for ESPs and other key types of research, while also considering diversity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First, each model lacks flexibility and adequate explanatory power across all couples and situations, by limiting its scope to a “one size fits all” set of categories and constructs for understanding clients. For example, across multiple evidence‐based couple therapies, a host of constructs are deemed essential to couple disharmony and success, and the presumed mechanisms of change and therapeutic strategies vary for each treatment (Gurman, ; Harris, Kelley, & Shepard, ; Snyder & Balderrama‐Durbin, ). Moreover, individual differences in the sources and functions of couple distress can result in some couples doing better in treatments espousing one model and others doing better in treatments espousing another model (Gurman, ; Lebow, Chambers, Christensen, & Johnson, ; Snyder & Balderrama‐Durbin, ).…”

Section: The Need For Principle‐based Integrative Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Importance of the Empirical Grounding of Principles Our fourth and final PBIT tenet advises that all models used in one's integrative treatment receive empirical examination and support, which includes but goes beyond RCTs. Thus, therapist and couple preferences and beliefs continue to be important, but they are applied only with treatments that already have empirical support, similar to multi-theoretical psychotherapy for depression (Harris et al, 2015). RCT support exists for some version of all of the models described within the case example-CB (Christensen, Atkins, Baucom, & Yi, 2010), MC (Beach et al, 2011), and EFT (Goldman & Greenberg, 1992;Johnson, 2015).…”

Section: Tenet 4: Principles Must Have An Empirical Basementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Principle‐Based Integrative Therapy with Couples: Theory and a Case Example

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Principle‐Based Integrative Therapy (PBIT) framework harnesses the principles of change underlying each theoretical model within integrative couple therapy treatments. PBIT has commonalities with other integrative approaches, and additional advantages stemming from its four tenets that guide therapists in combining strengths across models and overcoming each of their deficiencies. Tenet 1 advises that each model adds a core principle or mechanism of action that other models do not automatically address. Tenet 2 focuses on how techniques of one model may actualize the principles of other models. Tenet 3 ensures complementarity and a lack of conflict across principles. A case study and common case considerations are presented to illustrate how Tenets 1–3 can work in integrating Cognitive‐Behavioral, Multicultural, and Emotionally Focused Therapy models in working with a couple. Finally, Tenet 4 advocates for the use of models and empirically supported principles that also have received empirical support with diverse populations. Prerequisites and training implications for PBIT, and future clinical and research directions to further the utility of PBIT are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Tenet 4: Principles Must Have An Empirical Basesupporting

confidence: 59%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Need For Principle‐based Integrative Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tenet 4: Principles Must Have An Empirical Basementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Principle‐Based Integrative Therapy with Couples: Theory and a Case Example

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unification: The Fifth Pathway to Psychotherapy Integration

Marquis

Henriques

Anchin

et al. 2021

J Contemp Psychother

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of Treatment Descriptions and Alignment With Clinical Guidance of Apps for Depression on App Stores: Systematic Search and Content Analysis

Bowie-DaBreo¹,

Sünram-Lea²,

Sas³

et al. 2020

JMIR Form Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals and practitioners are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or the people using their service. It is not mandatory to apply the recommendations, and the guideline does not override the responsibility to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual, in consultation with them and their families and carers or guardian. Local commissioners and providers of healthcare have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual professionals and people using services wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with complying with those duties. Commissioners and providers have a responsibility to promote an environmentally sustainable health and care system and should assess and reduce the environmental impact of implementing NICE recommendations wherever possible.

show abstract

Multitheoretical psychotherapy for depression: Integrating strategies from evidence-based practices.

Cited by 5 publications

References 26 publications

Principle‐Based Integrative Therapy with Couples: Theory and a Case Example

Principle‐Based Integrative Therapy with Couples: Theory and a Case Example

Unification: The Fifth Pathway to Psychotherapy Integration

Evaluation of Treatment Descriptions and Alignment With Clinical Guidance of Apps for Depression on App Stores: Systematic Search and Content Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About