2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensory Enhancement of Odor Object Processing in Primary Olfactory Cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the orbitofrontal cortex is a multimodal region, it could potentially provide a similar amount of input to piriform cortex independent of whether input from an olfactory bulb occurs or not, and thereby stimulate similar development of connectivity. The fact that piriform cortex has been associated with complex processes, such as attention and memory (Zelano et al 2005;Zelano et al 2009), and even processing of non-olfactory information such as visual (Porada et al 2019) and intranasal trigeminal sensations (Albrecht et al 2010), further supports the notion that piriform cortex might receive a comparable magnitude of neural input from neocortical areas even in the absence of olfactory input. One of the most noteworthy examples is the fact that piriform cortex is activated by odorless sniffs (Sobel et al 1998), an activation that, at least tentatively, also occurs in individuals with congenital anosmia (Weiss et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Because the orbitofrontal cortex is a multimodal region, it could potentially provide a similar amount of input to piriform cortex independent of whether input from an olfactory bulb occurs or not, and thereby stimulate similar development of connectivity. The fact that piriform cortex has been associated with complex processes, such as attention and memory (Zelano et al 2005;Zelano et al 2009), and even processing of non-olfactory information such as visual (Porada et al 2019) and intranasal trigeminal sensations (Albrecht et al 2010), further supports the notion that piriform cortex might receive a comparable magnitude of neural input from neocortical areas even in the absence of olfactory input. One of the most noteworthy examples is the fact that piriform cortex is activated by odorless sniffs (Sobel et al 1998), an activation that, at least tentatively, also occurs in individuals with congenital anosmia (Weiss et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Nonetheless, we believe that the most parsimonious explanation is that the late beta is representing valence-dependent signals that project back, directly or indirectly, from other cerebral areas, such as the orbitofrontal, amygdala, and piriform cortex. These projections would then help shape the final interpretation of the odor by adding information of past experiences ( 51 ) as well as information about the odor object per se ( 52 54 )—two factors that are known to strongly influence the final odor valence percept ( 4 , 55 ). Nonetheless, the analysis we performed in this study was unable to demonstrate directionality and future studies need to determine this specific question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While converse relationships have been explored, for example, by finding that sounds can change the taste of wine (Spence & Wang, 2015), the effect of odors on sounds still needs to be further investigated. At the same time, Porada et al (2019) showed that cross-modal object information, consisting of odors, videos, and sounds, caused an increase in human posterior piriform cortex activity and resulted in an increased neural response to the odor object. This finding underlines the importance of crossmodal sensory stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%