2011
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2011.2166383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multisensor Fusion and Integration: Theories, Applications, and its Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensor data can be combined at the data level, the feature level and the decision level [14,23]. It requires interdisciplinary knowledge and techniques drawn from digital signal processing, statistical estimation and probability, control theory and artificial intelligence [14,28]. It has widespread applications including military applications, e.g.…”
Section: Sensor Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensor data can be combined at the data level, the feature level and the decision level [14,23]. It requires interdisciplinary knowledge and techniques drawn from digital signal processing, statistical estimation and probability, control theory and artificial intelligence [14,28]. It has widespread applications including military applications, e.g.…”
Section: Sensor Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [32], the main architectures are listed for sensor data fusion. The overall goal is to maximize the accuracy and minimize the complexity of the navigation system.…”
Section: Multisensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of integration can be defined by the variables used in the integration. Deeper levels of integration operate in range and tracking domains while more loose integration on the position domain [26,27,32,33,34,35,36].…”
Section: Multisensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRO′_rs is the new SRO_rs wherein the first n-ary meta-attribute columns are the meta-attributes of SRO 1 _rs, and the succeeding m-ary meta-attribute columns are the meta-attributes of SRO 2 _rs.  SRO′_rs = SRO 1 _rs ⋈ SRO 2 _rs ≡ {t | t = <t 1 , t 2 > ∧ t 1 ∈ SRO 1 _rs ∧ t 2 ∈ SRO 2 _rs ∧ t 1 [B] = t 2 [B]}, where t1 and t2 are the meta-attribute variables of SRO′_rs. SRO 1 _rs and SRO 2 _rs have the same meta-attribute column B = D = D , i.e., B is the common meta-attribute of these two SRO_rs instances and denotes the natural join operation derived from the product operation.…”
Section: Remote Sensor Resource Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%