2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale numerical modeling of propagation and coalescence of multiple cracks in rock masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the Young's modulus is 32.5 GPa, Poisson's ratio is 0.24, and fracture toughness is 1 MPa·√m. The maximum tangential stress criterion is employed as the failure criterion, which can be expressed as cosnormalθnormalc2()KIcos2normalθnormalc232KIIsinθc=KIC1em where K I is the SIF for mode I loading, K II is the SIF for mode II loading, and K IC is the fracture toughness for mode I loading. The crack initiation angle with respect to the pre‐existing crack (θ c ) is defined as θc=2arctan[]14()normalKnormalInormalKIIsign()normalKIInormalKnormalInormalKII2+8 where the sign function is defined as sign()normalKII={0.75em10.25emKII>00.75em0.5em10.25emKII<01em0.25em …”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the Young's modulus is 32.5 GPa, Poisson's ratio is 0.24, and fracture toughness is 1 MPa·√m. The maximum tangential stress criterion is employed as the failure criterion, which can be expressed as cosnormalθnormalc2()KIcos2normalθnormalc232KIIsinθc=KIC1em where K I is the SIF for mode I loading, K II is the SIF for mode II loading, and K IC is the fracture toughness for mode I loading. The crack initiation angle with respect to the pre‐existing crack (θ c ) is defined as θc=2arctan[]14()normalKnormalInormalKIIsign()normalKIInormalKnormalInormalKII2+8 where the sign function is defined as sign()normalKII={0.75em10.25emKII>00.75em0.5em10.25emKII<01em0.25em …”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the XFEM had been employed in many fields. Zhou and Yang employed the XFEM to model the deformation and failure of surrounding rock mass around the underground cavern. Patil et al used the XFEM to evaluate the elastic properties of heterogeneous materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liang et al [7] and Li et al [8] discussed the mechanical mechanism of the growth of surface crack using the rock failure process analysis (RFPA) program. Except the above literatures, other researchers using other different numerical methods, like discrete element method (DEM) [9,10], discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) [11], finite element method (FEM) [12,13], and extended finite element method (XFEM) [14], modeled the fracture propagation process and obtained different fracture propagation mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goncalves da Silva and Einstein (2013) implemented a strain-based and a normal stress-dependent criterion in FROCK to model the crack initiation, propagation, and coalescence through rock bridges, which appeared to yield better results than Bobet's stress-based criterion (Bobet and Einstein 1998). Based on the extended finite element method and global-local analysis, Zhou and Yang (2012) proposed a new multi-scale numerical model, in which the maximum circumferential stress criterion is used and the interaction integral method is employed to calculate the modes I and II SIFs, to model the crack initiation, propagation, and coalescence of multiple cracks in rock masses. Haeri et al (2014a) studied the crack propagation and coalescence based on modes I and II stress SIFs by a modified higher-order displacement discontinuity method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%