2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-014-0517-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Step-path failure of rock slopes with intermittent joints

Abstract: Step-path failure is a typical instable mode of rock slopes with intermittent joints. To gain deeper insight into the step-path failure mechanism, six rock slopes with different intermittent joints are studied using the 2D Particle Flow Code (PFC). Three different step-path failure modes, i.e., shear, tensile, and mixed tensile-shear failure, are observed by focusing on the crack initiation, propagation, and coalescence in the rock bridges. The cracks develop progressively in the rock bridges, which induce the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding the laws governing the failure behavior of rock defects is the goal of in-depth research concerning failure and stability in significant rock engineering projects [2]. Many critical disasters in extensive rock engineering are caused by the expansion and interconnection of joints in the rock mass [3]. To achieve the safe and economical design of rock mass engineering systems, it is necessary to scientifically understand the mechanical characteristics and fracture evolution of rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the laws governing the failure behavior of rock defects is the goal of in-depth research concerning failure and stability in significant rock engineering projects [2]. Many critical disasters in extensive rock engineering are caused by the expansion and interconnection of joints in the rock mass [3]. To achieve the safe and economical design of rock mass engineering systems, it is necessary to scientifically understand the mechanical characteristics and fracture evolution of rock mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous nonpenetrating intermittent joints in the rock slope control the strength of the rock mass and the failure mode of the slope. High stress concentration at the end of the intermittent joint may lead to the initiation, propagation, and penetration of cracks in the rock bridge which may ultimately cause sudden instability and macroscopic failure of the slope, and the rock slope instability mechanisms occur not only along existing discontinuities but also as complex internal processes associated with shear or tensile fracture in the intact rock, particularly in massive natural rock slopes and deep engineered slopes [1][2][3]. Meso-mechanical knowledge regarding the crack evolution laws and interaction between cracks and intermittent joints in the rock mass have crucial significance in terms of the failure mechanism of open-pit rock slopes under excavation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the classical finite element method (FEM) and the finite difference method (FDM), diverse new numerical approaches have been proposed (Soga et al, 2016). Smooth particle hydrodynamics (Cascini et al, 2014) has been used to simulate channelized landslides of flow type; the material point method (Soga et al, 2016;Abe et al, 2013;Marcelo et al, 2016;Bandara et al, 2016) can describe the whole process of landslide movement using hydromechanical coupling; the discrete element method has been used to model the instability of jointed rock slopes (Dong et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2015); and the finite element method with Lagrangian integration points (FEMLIP; Cuomo et al, 2013) has been developed from the particle-in-cell method (Harlow, 1964;Moresi et al, 2002Moresi et al, , 2003 and satisfies the two requirements for simulating the complete evolution of landslides: precise tracking of internal variables and the ability to solve large displacements (Li et al, 2016(Li et al, , 2018a. In contrast to the material point method, the numerical weight of material particles used in the FEMLIP method is updated at each time step, leading to an acceptable calculation cost, owing to the use of an implicit solver (Li et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%