2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale modeling of lithium-ion battery electrodes based on nano-scale X-ray computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(19), where Jeff is the effective diffusion flux, c is the molar concentration, ̇ is the effective heat flux, λ bulk is the bulk thermal conductivity. 84,102,146,147 By rearranging the temperature gradient, the heat flux and thus, the tortuosity can be calculated along each axis of a sample. Cooper et al 62 scanned a commercially available LiFePO4 battery cathode using X-ray synchrotron nano CT and investigated the tortuosity of the pore phase using heat flux simulation.…”
Section: Mesh Based Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19), where Jeff is the effective diffusion flux, c is the molar concentration, ̇ is the effective heat flux, λ bulk is the bulk thermal conductivity. 84,102,146,147 By rearranging the temperature gradient, the heat flux and thus, the tortuosity can be calculated along each axis of a sample. Cooper et al 62 scanned a commercially available LiFePO4 battery cathode using X-ray synchrotron nano CT and investigated the tortuosity of the pore phase using heat flux simulation.…”
Section: Mesh Based Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, battery research groups developed a similar focus as multiple studies connected performance degradation to changes in electrode microstructure, including particle fracture, transition metal distribution, surface reconstruction, and elemental dissolution 11–14. Simultaneously, significant advances in simulation technology made it possible to model the performance of electrochemical devices, provided an accurate representation of the microstructure and thermodynamic/kinetic processes are available 15–17. The use of 3D imaging techniques (e.g., focused ion beam (FIB) tomography and X‐ray computed tomography (CT)) now plays a key role supporting the study of electrode microstructures 18–23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FIB-SEM is destructive but has the ability to provide 3D imaging at higher spatial resolution than XRCT. Intensive work is now undertaken to use reconstructed 3D geometries for smarter electrochemical modeling than the state-of-the-art modeling based on idealized microstructures, [36][37][38][39] but still with very little or even no confrontation to measured electrochemical performance. [31,32] XRCT and FIB-SEM thus enable to extensively analyze a number of geometric parameters (volume fraction, surface area, particle size distribution, tortuosity…), which is of great potential to rationally design and optimize the formulation and the processing of composite electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%