1960
DOI: 10.1109/tns2.1960.4315736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplier-Phototube Development Program at RCA-Lancaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of the standard dynode chain and the recommended interdynode potentials, required for proper electron optics, would have led, at our high light intensity levels, to a situation where the anode current would have vastly exceeded 10% of the dynode current. Above that level it is generally accepted that PMT performance is degraded, resulting in a loss of linearity and optical response, i.e., a lower apparent absorption …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of the standard dynode chain and the recommended interdynode potentials, required for proper electron optics, would have led, at our high light intensity levels, to a situation where the anode current would have vastly exceeded 10% of the dynode current. Above that level it is generally accepted that PMT performance is degraded, resulting in a loss of linearity and optical response, i.e., a lower apparent absorption …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signals from scattered laser light and two background readings (one simultaneous with and combined with the scattered light; the other at close later time), are recorded for each detector channel. The light detection process follows Poisson statistics [8,9]. The number of detected photoelectrons has a probability law (probability density function) of the form p(x, µ) = µ x e −µ /x!…”
Section: Signal Formation From Poisson Distributions Of Thomson Scatt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal Uncertainty. The standard deviation in the anode pulse due to photon statistics and PM contributions (11) is given by =(1 -1/(5 -1 ) 2…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between molecular environments can be distinguished on the basis of chemical shifts whereas quantitative estimations can be calculated from relative measurements of signal integrals. Regarding functions of interest the wide observed chemical shift range (12 ppm) in 29Si NMR of Me3Si derivatives relative to the one observed (2 ppm) in 19F NMR of TFA derivatives provides a good distinction between different environments (4,11,14,19). For this reason Me3Si derivatives give the most qualitative information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%