1984
DOI: 10.1021/ac00278a025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the graphite spark technique using time resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical detection limits for the analysis of solids using spark emission spectroscopy range from a few ppm to a few 100 ppb; in terms of absolute mass, subnanogram detection limits have been reported. [23][24][25][26] Spark spectroscopy has also been applied to analysis of airborne particles with limited success. Hunter et al used an electrode system to create spark plasma in the inter-electrode space where the aerosol sample passed through, which allowed on-the-fly emission detection and quantification, albeit with poor limits of detection (in the range 10-1200 mg m À3 ) and sampling statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical detection limits for the analysis of solids using spark emission spectroscopy range from a few ppm to a few 100 ppb; in terms of absolute mass, subnanogram detection limits have been reported. [23][24][25][26] Spark spectroscopy has also been applied to analysis of airborne particles with limited success. Hunter et al used an electrode system to create spark plasma in the inter-electrode space where the aerosol sample passed through, which allowed on-the-fly emission detection and quantification, albeit with poor limits of detection (in the range 10-1200 mg m À3 ) and sampling statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%