2002
DOI: 10.1128/aac.46.7.2155-2161.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex PCR Strategy for Rapid Identification of Structural Types and Variants of the mec Element in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Full characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) requires definition of not only the bacterial genetic background but also the structure of the complex and heterologous mec element these bacteria carry, which is associated with drug resistance determinant mecA. We report the development, validation, and application of a multiplex PCR strategy that allows quick presumptive characterization of the mec element types based on the structural features that were shown to be typical of mec e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

20
941
2
29

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,229 publications
(992 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
20
941
2
29
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCCmec multiplex PCR assay was performed according to the method of Oliveira and de Lancastre [17] with modifications in the primer concentrations. Concentrations for primers were as follows: 0.25 lM for CIF2 F2, CIF2 R2, MECI P2, MECI P3, RIF5 F10, RIF5 R13; 0.3 lM for IS431 P4, pUB110 R1; 0.5 lM for pT181 R1; 1.0 lM for DCS F2, DCS R1, RIF4 F3, RIF4 R9, MECA P4, MECA P7 and 1.7 lM for KDP F1, KDP R1.…”
Section: Sccmec Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SCCmec multiplex PCR assay was performed according to the method of Oliveira and de Lancastre [17] with modifications in the primer concentrations. Concentrations for primers were as follows: 0.25 lM for CIF2 F2, CIF2 R2, MECI P2, MECI P3, RIF5 F10, RIF5 R13; 0.3 lM for IS431 P4, pUB110 R1; 0.5 lM for pT181 R1; 1.0 lM for DCS F2, DCS R1, RIF4 F3, RIF4 R9, MECA P4, MECA P7 and 1.7 lM for KDP F1, KDP R1.…”
Section: Sccmec Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations for primers were as follows: 0.25 lM for CIF2 F2, CIF2 R2, MECI P2, MECI P3, RIF5 F10, RIF5 R13; 0.3 lM for IS431 P4, pUB110 R1; 0.5 lM for pT181 R1; 1.0 lM for DCS F2, DCS R1, RIF4 F3, RIF4 R9, MECA P4, MECA P7 and 1.7 lM for KDP F1, KDP R1. The multiplex PCR included eight loci (A-H) [17]. MRSA strains NCTC10442, N315, 85/2082, and WSPP A were included as controls for SCCmec types I, II, III, and IV, respectively.…”
Section: Sccmec Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolate HSA10 had ccr type 3 and mec complex type A and was therefore classified as SCCmec type III (19). However, by the multiplex PCR strategy it was determined that there was amplification of the locus corresponding to the dcs region that was not detectable in the SCCmec type III of previously characterized MRSA strains (19,28,29). Isolates JP87 and JP238 had ccr type 2 and mec complex type A and were therefore classified as SCCmec type II (19).…”
Section: Bacterial Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…types I, II, III, and IV were associated with 6, 2, 2, and 11 different STs, respectively (Table 2). For four isolates (HSA10, JP87, JP238, and TAW166), the SCCmec type could not be directly inferred by the multiplex PCR strategy since the amplification patterns observed did not exactly correspond to the ones described by Oliveira et al (28). For these four isolates, SCCmec types were determined by PCR typing the mec gene and the ccr gene complexes (26).…”
Section: Bacterial Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation