2004
DOI: 10.1086/422650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-Year Experience in the Diagnosis of Viral Central Nervous System Infections with a Panel of Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of 11 Viruses

Abstract: The value of PCR in the diagnosis of viral infections has been established. PCR is of lower value in the detection of WNV in CNS, compared with serological testing, but is of greater value in the detection of other arboviruses, particularly viruses in the California serogroup. Medical chart reviews indicated that apparent CNS infection resolves in approximately 50% of cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…PCR testing of CSF has become the diagnostic method of choice for CNS viral infections because of the low yield from CSF cultures (15). When a causative agent is found, HSV and enterovirus are the most commonly identified viral pathogens (3,6,11), which is in agreement with our findings. Prompt diagnosis of herpes simplex virus encephalitis is especially important because treatment with intravenous acyclovir decreases morbidity and mortality (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…PCR testing of CSF has become the diagnostic method of choice for CNS viral infections because of the low yield from CSF cultures (15). When a causative agent is found, HSV and enterovirus are the most commonly identified viral pathogens (3,6,11), which is in agreement with our findings. Prompt diagnosis of herpes simplex virus encephalitis is especially important because treatment with intravenous acyclovir decreases morbidity and mortality (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…At this time, the diagnosis of viral CNS infections is usually obtained through the combination of multiple PCR and RT-PCR assays, resulting in laboratory confirmation of approximately 45% of physician-diagnosed cases (4,27). This failure can be explained by the inconsistency between the small volume of CSF available and the large number of viruses potentially responsible for meningitis or encephalitis (15). In the first step, the use of a multiplex PCR approach allowed us to broaden the detection of neurotropic viruses (2,6,7,8,22,29,31,32,41,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also the major etiologic agents of aseptic meningitis cases for which an etiologic agent was identified [17][18][19]. Since the introduction of the mumps vaccine, mumps meningitis has become far less common in those countries in which it is widely used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%