Multiple systems of category learning

Abstract

We review neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence for the existence of three qualitatively different categorization systems. These categorization systems are themselves based on three distinct memory systems: working memory (WM), explicit long-term memory (explicit LTM), and implicit long-term memory (implicit LTM). We first contrast categorization based on WM with that based on explicit LTM, where the former typically involves applying rules to a test item and the latter involves determining the similarity between stored exemplars or prototypes and a test item. Neuroimaging studies show differences between brain activity in normal participants as a function of whether they are instructed to categorize novel test items by rule or by similarity to known category members. Rule instructions typically lead to more activation in frontal or parietal areas, associated with WM and selective attention, whereas similarity instructions may activate parietal areas associated with the integration of perceptual features. Studies with neurological patients in the same paradigms provide converging evidence, e.g., patients with Alzheimer's disease, who have damage in prefrontal regions, are more impaired with rule than similarity instructions. Our second contrast is between categorization based on explicit LTM with that based on implicit LTM. Neuropsychological studies with patients with medial-temporal lobe show that patients are impaired on tasks requiring explicit LTM, but perform relatively normally on an implicit categorization task. Neuroimaging studies provide converging evidence: Whereas explicit categorization is mediated by activation in numerous frontal and parietal areas, implicit categorization is mediated by a deactivation in posterior cortex.

Specific language impairment as systemic developmental disorders

“…Behavioural studies suggest potential problems with working memory, procedural memory and long-term memory. These systems are also referred to as short-term explicit memory, long-term implicit memory and long-term explicit memory (Smith & Grossman, 2008). There are still many views regarding the logical and neurological organisation of the memory system.…”

Model-based fMRI Reveals Dissimilarity Processes Underlying Base Rate Neglect

“…On each trial, participants are presented with two cues: one an imperfect predictor I, and the other either a common perfect predictor PC or rare perfect predictor hidden to behavior. As a first pass, the goal of distinguishing between the neural regions associated with high-level inferential processes, such as hypothesis testing, rule switching, and problem solving and lower-level associative learning have been one of the main foci of neurobiological category learning research (Ashby and Maddox, 2005;Smith and Grossman, 2008;Seger and Miller, 2010). For example, rule-based processes, akin to those underlying inferential theories, are thought to depend upon cortico-striatal loops involving the PFC and head of the caudate nucleus, whereas simple visual associations may be learned using visual and procedural loops connecting the tail of the caudate with visual regions and motor outputs.…”

Differential category learning processes: The neural basis of comparison-based learning and induction

“…On the other hand, learning scenarios such as information-integration category learning, (where there is a within-category interdependence among certain featuredimensions), or some prototype learning tasks, involve learning representations which people fail to describe verbally (Ashby and Gott, 1988). For this reason it is frequently suggested that learning different category structures involves a variety of computational challenges, which are met by different neural mechanisms in the human brain (Ashby and O'Brien, 2005;Smith and Grossman, 2008).…”