2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00542-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple surface properties of worn RGP lenses and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
67
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An influence of nanometer-scale roughness on the deposition of P. aeruginosa to contact lenses was also observed by Bruinsma et al (2003). This influence of nanometer-scale roughness is surprising and indicates that adhesion of bacteria is mediated by structures much smaller than the bacterium itself, like fimbriae, flagella or polymeric substances excreted by bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…An influence of nanometer-scale roughness on the deposition of P. aeruginosa to contact lenses was also observed by Bruinsma et al (2003). This influence of nanometer-scale roughness is surprising and indicates that adhesion of bacteria is mediated by structures much smaller than the bacterium itself, like fimbriae, flagella or polymeric substances excreted by bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Roughness on a nanoscale has been shown to be beneficial for P. aeruginosa adhesion on contact lenses made of silicon hydrogel. 48 In two recent studies investigating the adherence of bacteria to medicinally used titanium, the investigators reported that both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa adhered better to the specifically treated and thus on a nanoscale rougher titanium surface than they did to a smooth surface equivalent. 49 Thereby, the observed interspecies differences in adherence could be ascribed to the morphological characteristics of the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides detailed information on the surface characteristics of contact lenses (Bhatia et al, 1997;Baguet et al, 1993;Baguet et al, 1995;Bruinsma et al, 2003;Lira et al, 2008;Guryca et al, 2007;Gonzalez-Meijome et al, 2006a;Gonzalez-Meijome et al, 2009;Teichroeb et al, 2008;Maldonado-Codina and Efron, 2005) and is a powerful tool for the high resolution examination of the structure of the hydrated contact lens surface. The method has the advantages that it avoids artefacts due to dehydration and coating (Bhatia et al, 1997;Kim et al, 2002), and allows for non-destructive surface topography and roughness measurements.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, AFM has proved useful for characterizing tear deposits on worn soft contact lens surfaces (Baguet et al, 1995;Rebeix et al, 2000) or characterizing the rigid gas permeable contact lens surface (Bruinsma et al, 2003). In fact, detailed information about the surface quality of CL has been studied previously by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (Bhatia et al, 1997;Baguet et al, 1993;Baguet et al, 1995;Bruinsma et al, 2003;Gonzalez-Meijome et al, 2006a;Gonzalez-Meijome et al, 2009;Giraldez et al, 2010c) and Cryo-SEM (Gonzalez-Meijome et al, 2006b;Guryca et al, 2007). AFM is a very powerful tool for high resolution examination of hydrated CL surface structure.…”
Section: Atomic Force Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation