1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.1996.0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple sound scattering by densely packed shoals of marine animals

Abstract: Brief information on packing density and size of fish and krill oceanic shoals is given. The sound field scattered by a mass of discrete inhomogeneities is calculated using the modified Börn approximation. For shoals of the above-mentioned animals, a validity range for the single scattering approximation is established. It is shown that the effect of multiple sound scattering is considerable only for densely packed shoals of small fishes and krill.1996 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that fish comprising the daytime sub-surface and near-surface pelagic fish aggregations were respectively about 60 and 30 cm FL, our estimates of mean packing densities for these aggregations would be in reasonable agreement with the values given by Andreeva and Belousov (1996). Moreover, the packing density of the sub-surface pelagic fish aggregation is quite similar to the mean fish density estimated by in the same area around moored FADs in French Polynesia.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that fish comprising the daytime sub-surface and near-surface pelagic fish aggregations were respectively about 60 and 30 cm FL, our estimates of mean packing densities for these aggregations would be in reasonable agreement with the values given by Andreeva and Belousov (1996). Moreover, the packing density of the sub-surface pelagic fish aggregation is quite similar to the mean fish density estimated by in the same area around moored FADs in French Polynesia.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…References to packing densities of shoals of fish larger than small pelagic species are scarce in the literature (Pitcher and Partridge, 1979;Andreeva and Belousov, 1996). Assuming that fish comprising the daytime sub-surface and near-surface pelagic fish aggregations were respectively about 60 and 30 cm FL, our estimates of mean packing densities for these aggregations would be in reasonable agreement with the values given by Andreeva and Belousov (1996).…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…47 This effect is apparent in the EK60 echograms as smearing of the real school toward the seabed [ Fig. 2(b)].…”
Section: A Ek60 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Акустическое зондирование на основе обратного рассеяния звука позволяет изучать мелкомасштабную структуру морской среды и ее изменчивость, связанную с турбулентными образованиями, проявлением внутренних волн, наличием пузырьков, твердых взвесей, а также планктона и других биологических объектов. Наиболее изменчивым слоем водной толщи океана является верхний слой, и для этого слоя характерно сосредоточение биоресурсов и наличие интенсивных динамических процессов, существенно влияющих на распределение практически всех биологических объектов [1][2][3][4]. Данные о рассеянии звука имеются для сравнительно низких и средних частот звука, которые в основном использовались в рыбопоисковой технологии [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Наиболее изменчивым слоем водной толщи океана является верхний слой, и для этого слоя характерно сосредоточение биоресурсов и наличие интенсивных динамических процессов, существенно влияющих на распределение практически всех биологических объектов [1][2][3][4]. Данные о рассеянии звука имеются для сравнительно низких и средних частот звука, которые в основном использовались в рыбопоисковой технологии [1,2]. Информация о величине и природе высокочастотного рассеяния более скудна [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified