2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4763981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulations of multi-beam sonar echos from schooling individual fish in a quiet environment

Abstract: A model is developed and demonstrated for simulating echosounder and sonar observations of fish schools with specified shapes and composed of individuals having specified target strengths and behaviors. The model emulates the performances of actual multi-frequency echosounders and multi-beam echosounders and sonars and generates synthetic echograms of fish schools that can be compared with real echograms. The model enables acoustic observations of large in situ fish schools to be evaluated in terms of individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, non‐feeding fishes, with no other force influencing them other than the risk of predation, will exhibit less individualistic behaviour and form denser shoals as predation risk increases (Fréon et al ., ; Gerlotto et al ., ). In comparison, Holmin () estimated the density of a wild C. harengus school in the Norwegian Sea outside the feeding and reproduction periods to be S v = −33·2 dB re 1 m −1 . Then, it is reasonable to assume that the social conditions that fish experienced in the high‐density school may reflect those of C. harengus in the wild during periods where the prime motivation is survival rather than reproduction or feeding, while the low‐density school may correspond to school densities observed during periods in which the fitness trade‐offs may have shifted towards feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, non‐feeding fishes, with no other force influencing them other than the risk of predation, will exhibit less individualistic behaviour and form denser shoals as predation risk increases (Fréon et al ., ; Gerlotto et al ., ). In comparison, Holmin () estimated the density of a wild C. harengus school in the Norwegian Sea outside the feeding and reproduction periods to be S v = −33·2 dB re 1 m −1 . Then, it is reasonable to assume that the social conditions that fish experienced in the high‐density school may reflect those of C. harengus in the wild during periods where the prime motivation is survival rather than reproduction or feeding, while the low‐density school may correspond to school densities observed during periods in which the fitness trade‐offs may have shifted towards feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquiring reliable quantitative measurements of behaviour of aquatic organisms in natural environments is a challenging task. The use of acoustics has proved to offer a unique opportunity to describe and quantify structural characteristics and the dynamic behaviour of fish shoals (Pitcher et al ., ; Simmonds & MacLennan, ; Holmin, ). This technique also allows for investigations of fine‐scale predator–prey interactions in the field (Handegard et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are several notable studies that explore collective movement in situ [10,[42][43][44][45], recent technological advances are poised to dramatically improve our ability to collect data on the movements of animal groups. In this issue, Hughey et al [46] review the advances that now permit data collection on the movements of, and interactions within, animal groups in the wild, from animal-mounted biologgers [47] to aerial video [48] and acoustic [49] field imagery. Moreover, technology such as GPS-enabled data loggers may turn animals themselves into environmental sensors that can be used to capture fine-scale physical data, such as detailed maps of airflow within complex thermal updrafts [47].…”
Section: Overview Of Contributed Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backscatter (Sv) values were adjusted to correct for the effects of angular response of insonified juvenile pollock within the steered beams (Towler et al, 2003;Cutter and Demer, 2007;Holmin et al, 2012). This was done by averaging Sv values per beam (Svc) based on the evidence that the pollock were not responding to the vessel (Stienessen, 2015) and under the assumption the fish were not aligned geoghraphically.…”
Section: Defining and Isolating A Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%